{
  "_note": "Consistency re-pass, 2026-10-21, after the blind second-coder check found O3b and O4 mentions inside advocates' quotes that the first coding missed. Every news story's text was searched for both facts and each mention classified by voice: 'fact' = stated by the reporter or a neutral source (court, agency, analyst); 'advocate' = only in a campaign side's quote or paraphrase. O3b/O4 = 1 means the fact appears in either voice.",
  "O3b": {
    "X2": "fact",
    "ST-13B": "fact",
    "S1": "fact",
    "EH-WSS": "advocate",
    "G01": "advocate",
    "K07": "advocate",
    "K08": "advocate",
    "PUB-10": "advocate",
    "C3": "advocate",
    "C4": "advocate",
    "C5": "advocate"
  },
  "O4": {
    "PUB-19": "fact",
    "K01": "fact",
    "K06": "fact",
    "COL-NYT": "fact",
    "PUB-01": "fact",
    "PUB-05": "fact",
    "PUB-12": "fact",
    "K07": "advocate",
    "L1": "advocate",
    "C6": "advocate"
  },
  "claims_checked_add": {
    "_note": "N460K re-pass of every news text after the second coder found the claim, with context, in two stories the first coding had not recorded.",
    "PUB-02": [
      "N460K"
    ],
    "SR-10M": [
      "N460K"
    ]
  }
}