Coded departures from the record, Seattle Times I-638 news coverage
Every item flagged in review, including neutral and excluded items. Own-voice departures are the rows whose category is factual-firm, factual-arguable or framing.
Unit of observation: One coded statement or headline in one news story
| id | date | url | quote | whats_true | category | favors | severity | correction | found_by | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 2025-02-10 | seattletimes.com |
that has often proved a fraught marker, with several high-profile cases of cisgender women testing at naturally higher levels of testosterone, and murky scientific backing that high testosterone levels necessarily cause better athletic performance
|
Male-range testosterone from puberty is the main driver of the roughly 10-30% male performance gap (Handelsman, Hirschberg & Bermon, Endocr Rev 2018). The high-profile 'high T' cases were athletes with 46,XY DSD, not typical cisgender women.
|
factual-arguable | No | major | No | blind coder |
Narrowly about testosterone within the female range; "cisgender" for XY-DSD cases is contested. A neutral endocrinologist is quoted next.
|
| B2 | 2025-02-10 | seattletimes.com |
Their complaints have been magnified by conservative media and a successful presidential campaign that stoked fears
|
Characterization in the outlet's voice. Parents' fairness and safety concerns are framed as media- and campaign-driven fear.
|
framing | No | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| B3 | 2025-05-22 | seattletimes.com |
falling one vote shot (31-23)
|
The vote was 31-22 of 53 (ST 2025-04-22); 31+23=54.
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No (a correction exists but covers the headline only) | blind coder | — |
| B4 | 2025-05-22 | seattletimes.com |
Original headline (per URL slug): 'Quilcene School District bans transgender athletes from school sports'
|
The resolution set sex-at-birth eligibility for male and female categories. It did not bar trans students from school sports.
|
factual-firm | No | minor | Yes | blind coder |
Corrected by the Times.
|
| B7 | 2025-05-31 | seattletimes.com |
Washington's state law allowing transgender athletes to participate in sports consistent with their gender identity has been in place since 2007
|
The 2008-09 participation rule is a WIAA policy (ST 2026-10-14, 2026-10-30); the WLAD gender-identity protection dates from 2006. The 2007 WIAA policy required surgery or hormones (ST 2026-10-30).
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No (a correction exists but covers relay participation only) | blind coder |
Recurs in about ten stories.
|
| B5 | 2025-06-11 | seattletimes.com |
Original headline (per URL slug): '...after banning transgender athletes from sports'
|
Same as row 4.
|
factual-firm | No | minor | Yes | blind coder |
Corrected by the Times.
|
| B6 | 2025-06-11 | seattletimes.com |
The approval of the resolution has drawn swift, negative reaction from Quilcene teachers, students, the community
|
Says in the outlet's voice that 'the community' reacted negatively. The board passed it 3-2, and no supporter in the community was sought or quoted.
|
framing | No | minor | n/a | blind coder | — |
| B8 | 2025-10-14 | seattletimes.com |
(Research to suggest transgender athletes have an advantage in sports is limited and inconclusive.)
|
Reviews (Hilton & Lundberg, Sports Med 2021; Harper et al., Br J Sports Med 2021) find strength, muscle and lean mass stay above female levels even after testosterone suppression. WA requires no suppression at all. Only direct sports-performance data are disputed (Roberts 2021 vs Hamilton 2024).
|
factual-arguable | No | major | No | blind coder |
Hechinger Report partner story run under Education Lab; the parenthetical may be Hechinger text.
|
| B10 | 2026-01-09 | seattletimes.com |
would restrict transgender student athletes from participating in girls' K-12 public school athletic programs
|
Sec. 3(1) covers 'schools and the WIAA', and the WIAA includes private member schools. ST 2026-10-27 says 'public and some private K-12 schools'.
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No | blind coder |
Low confidence.
|
| B9 | 2026-01-09 | seattletimes.com |
The initiative's language does not directly reference 'genital examinations' but it would require documentation of a student's sex assigned at birth as part of a physical exam.
|
Answers Jinkins's 'every girl over 12 ... invasive genital examination' with a hedge ('directly'). The text names no exam, any one of three bases suffices, and the basis is 'biological sex', not a birth assignment (Sec. 3(2)).
|
framing | No | minor | No | blind coder |
Hedged check of the genital-exam claim.
|
| P2 | 2026-01-23 | seattletimes.com |
The initiative's language does not include "genital examinations," but it does indicate
|
The text names no exam; any one of three bases suffices.
|
framing | No | minor | No | primary audit |
Hedged check of the genital-exam claim.
|
| B11 | 2026-02-04 | seattletimes.com |
There have been no confirmed instances of violence perpetrated by transgender students in that time.
|
Sweeping claim in the outlet's voice with no source. A Puyallup-district student had reported to police on Jan 30 2026 that a trans opponent sexually assaulted her during a wrestling match (ST 2026-08-03). It is unconfirmed, and charges were declined.
|
factual-arguable | No | major | No | blind coder |
Unsourced negative. The Puyallup allegation was reported to police Jan 30 but not public until about Feb 9; it remains unproven.
|
| B12 | 2026-02-04 | seattletimes.com |
pointing to decades of evidence that suggests gender-affirming care significantly improves physical and mental health outcomes for youth
|
Systematic reviews rate the evidence for youth as low-certainty (Cass Review and York reviews 2024; HHS review 2025). Medical associations do endorse the care.
|
excluded | No | minor | No | blind coder |
Associations' positions are stated accurately and attributed; counted as uneven checking, not a departure.
|
| B13 | 2026-03-05 | seattletimes.com |
A recently certified state initiative could turn that routine screening into something far more invasive and subjective.
|
Sec. 3(2) names no exam or procedure and lets the provider rely on any one basis. The same story later says 'It does not mandate a specific test'. The lede states a contested opposition argument as the outlet's own framing.
|
framing | No | major | No (an editor's note exists but covers the Li quote only) | blind coder | — |
| B14 | 2026-03-05 | seattletimes.com |
the initiative wants medical providers to determine a child's gender based on...
|
Sec. 3(2) verifies 'biological sex'. It does not determine gender.
|
factual-arguable | No | minor | No | blind coder |
Wording ("gender" for "biological sex"); arguably a paraphrase.
|
| B15 | 2026-03-05 | seattletimes.com |
Some athletics governing bodies already have mandated tests, which have shown limits in reliability. For instance, cisgender and intersex elite athletes have been barred from competition for natural testosterone levels above the standard set for women.
|
I-638 sets no testosterone threshold, which the story itself notes later. The elite cases were XY-DSD athletes. The analogy implies girls could be excluded for natural T.
|
framing | No | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| B16 | 2026-03-05 | seattletimes.com |
Heywood: 'This is already required, it has been for 50-plus years for boys and girls' ... 'in 99.9% of cases' sex confirmed through medical history
|
The WIAA provider-signed eligibility form has had no sex field since 2019, and medical history is not a Sec. 3(2) basis. The physicians' rebuttal (no blood tests or pelvic exams) does not address either claim.
|
unchecked | Yes | minor | No | blind coder |
The story did add "Physicians dispute that characterization."
|
| B17 | 2026-03-05 | seattletimes.com |
Dr. Glenna Martin, a Washington board-certified pediatrician
|
ST 2026-10-28 calls the same doctor 'a family physician' specializing in 'family, addiction and abortion medicine'. One of the two is wrong.
|
excluded | No | minor | No | blind coder |
Which description of the doctor is right could not be verified.
|
| P1 | 2026-03-05 | seattletimes.com |
About 18% of Washington children lack consistent access to medical care, according to the Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health.
|
No Data Resource Center measure has this name. 2023-24 WA values: 25.3% have no personal doctor or nurse; 11.3% have no usual source of sick care. The figure likely describes a regular provider or checkup, not access to care.
|
factual-arguable | No | minor | No | primary audit |
Source year not confirmed.
|
| P5 | 2026-03-05 | seattletimes.com |
It is an effort to keep transgender girls from competing.
|
I-638 bars them only from female-only competition; boys' and open teams are unaffected.
|
framing | No | minor | No | red team | — |
| B18 | 2026-07-29 | seattletimes.com |
statewide initiatives 638 and 001 ... which would effectively bar transgender students from participating in girls' athletics
|
I-001 is the parental-rights measure (ST voter guide 2026-10-15). Only I-638 concerns sports.
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| B19 | 2026-07-29 | seattletimes.com |
initiatives 638 and 001 ... which would bar transgender students from participating in girls athletics
|
Same as row 18.
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| B20 | 2026-07-30 | seattletimes.com |
initiatives 638 and 001 ... which would bar transgender students from participating in girls athletics
|
Same as row 18.
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| B21 | 2026-08-27 | seattletimes.com |
(quoted voter-guide passage) 'a licensed medical professional would verify sex based on the student's birth records, medical history and/or a standard, non-invasive physical examination'
|
Birth records and medical history are not listed bases. Sec. 3(2) allows only reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup or endogenous testosterone. The story is about whether this exact passage is accurate, quotes the three bases, and never notes the mismatch.
|
unchecked | Yes | major | No | blind coder | — |
| B22 | 2026-08-27 | seattletimes.com |
Hoopman: these appointments can include genital exams for children under a certain age, or for clinical reasons, but they're not required as part of preventive care for older kids or teenagers
|
AAP Bright Futures well-visit guidelines include visual genital inspection for sexual maturity rating in girls 11-17. The story is about the AAP citation, and LGW's release pointed to Bright Futures, but the claim was not checked.
|
unchecked | No | major | No | blind coder | — |
| P3 | 2026-08-27 | seattletimes.com |
The initiative's language does not include the phrase "genital examinations," but it does indicate the required confirmation could come from
|
The text names no exam; any one of three bases suffices.
|
framing | No | minor | No | symmetry test |
Hedged check of the genital-exam claim.
|
| B23 | 2026-09-29 | seattletimes.com |
Ferguson: I-638 ... 'will force them into invasive sex verification exams in order to participate in sports'
|
Sec. 3(2) names no exam, any one basis suffices, and verification happens within the routine sports physical. The story is about this statement; it gives LGW's denial but no check against the text.
|
unchecked | No | major | No (a correction exists but covers an org name only) | blind coder |
The story carried LGW's denial but not the text.
|
| B24 | 2026-09-29 | seattletimes.com |
Herzberg: would only require 'an athlete's doctor to confirm the athlete's sex using existing medical history forms or their own knowledge of the patient'
|
Medical history forms are not a Sec. 3(2) basis. The PPE history form is filled in by the family and asks 'sex assigned at birth'. Left unchecked.
|
unchecked | Yes | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| B25 | 2026-09-29 | seattletimes.com |
The AAP recommends an annual wellness exam, which includes things like immunizations, nutrition and development. Those exams are distinct from sports physicals
|
Leaves out that the AAP well exam includes visual genital inspection (SMR) for girls 11-17 (Bright Futures), which is the basis of LGW's AAP citation. In the outlet's voice.
|
framing | No | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| P4 | 2026-09-29 | seattletimes.com |
A Ballot Initiative Strategy Center poll suggests that both school-related initiatives face an uphill battle at the ballot box
|
The sponsor is a progressive ballot-measure group and an in-kind contributor to the No campaign (PDC); no date or margin of error was given. Later Times stories labeled it "liberal".
|
framing | No | minor | No | primary audit |
Not corrected.
|
| P8 | 2026-09-29 | seattletimes.com |
this confirmation can come from a typical sports physical's examination of "the student's reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or normal endogenously produced testosterone levels."
|
A sports physical does not test genetics or hormones; the sentence also implies an anatomy exam at the physical. Repeated 2026-10-30.
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No | primary audit |
Mixed: understates lab burden, implies an exam.
|
| B26 | 2026-10-14 | seattletimes.com |
Washington voters will weigh in on the future of transgender athletes in youth sports via I-638
|
I-638 covers K-12 interschool athletics only, not club or recreational youth sports.
|
framing | No | minor | No | blind coder |
Minor: "youth sports" for K-12 interschool athletics.
|
| B27 | 2026-10-14 | seattletimes.com |
would ban transgender girls from competing in K-12 sports (pre-correction wording, Wayback capture)
|
Correction: 'updated to clarify that if passed, Initiative 638 would ban transgender girls from competing in girls sports'. The scope was apparently overstated or misdescribed.
|
factual-firm | No | minor | Yes | blind coder |
Corrected by the Times; pre-correction wording from a Wayback capture.
|
| B28 | 2026-10-15 | seattletimes.com |
Washington voters will weigh in on the future of transgender athletes in youth sports via I-638
|
Same as row 26.
|
framing | No | minor | No | blind coder |
Minor: "youth sports".
|
| B29 | 2026-10-22 | seattletimes.com |
would require students participating in K-12 sports to submit medical documentation that verifies their 'biological sex' as female
|
Only students entering female-only competition must do so (Sec. 3(2)). The wording reads as all K-12 participants.
|
factual-firm | No | minor | No (an editor's note exists but covers the walk-off detail only) | blind coder |
Uncorrected as of 2026-10-30.
|
| B30 | 2026-10-22 | seattletimes.com |
Opponents of the ballot initiative say that, if passed, the measure will require invasive genital exams. ... Kruse called those claims 'lies'
|
The story sets the dispute against the text but never says the text names no exam and that any one basis suffices. Gallagher's genital-exam claim is left standing.
|
excluded | No | minor | No | blind coder |
The story did give the text's three bases; partial check.
|
| B31 | 2026-10-25 | seattletimes.com |
When voters approve an initiative, the new law can't be modified by lawmakers for two years.
|
Wash. Const. Art. II Sec. 41 allows amendment within two years by a two-thirds vote of each chamber.
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| B32 | 2026-10-27 | seattletimes.com |
since 2007, the state's high school athletics association has allowed transgender students to compete on the sports teams aligned with their gender identity
|
The gender-identity policy dates to 2008-09. The 2007 policy required surgery or hormone therapy (ST 2026-10-30, 2026-10-14).
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No | blind coder |
Recurring date error.
|
| B33 | 2026-10-28 | seattletimes.com |
the initiative does not explicitly require genital exams for anyone ... That does not mean that all providers would be required to give students pelvic exams
|
The text names no exam (Sec. 3(2)). 'Explicitly' and 'not all' imply an implicit or partial exam requirement. Pelvic (internal) exams are not implied by any basis.
|
framing | No | minor | No | blind coder |
Hedged check of the genital-exam claim.
|
| B34 | 2026-10-28 | seattletimes.com |
Herzberg: providers could confirm 'based on history of treating the patient' ... 'In most cases, it would just be a doctor relying on existing medical records to check that box'
|
Medical history and records are not listed bases. The provider must rely 'only on' anatomy, genetics or endogenous testosterone. The story is about what doctors must do and leaves this unchecked.
|
unchecked | Yes | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| B35 | 2026-10-28 | seattletimes.com |
(omission) doctors quoted saying they don't do pelvic exams or testing; no mention that routine well visits already include genital inspection
|
AAP Bright Futures includes visual genital inspection (SMR) for girls 11-17. This is relevant to the story's question of what doctors must do.
|
framing | No | minor | No | blind coder | — |
| P6 | 2026-10-28 | seattletimes.com |
the measure's vague writing has left many health experts throughout the state uncertain or misinformed
|
Sec. 3(2) lists the three permitted bases explicitly; "vague" is the No campaign's characterization stated in the paper's voice.
|
framing | No | minor | No | red team | — |
| P7 | 2026-10-28 | seattletimes.com |
It would not require a new, additional medical appointment.
|
Literally true, but understates the burden when a provider orders a lab test.
|
framing | Yes | minor | No | red team |
Arguable.
|
| B36 | 2026-10-30 | seattletimes.com |
would ban transgender girls from girls K-12 sports, and require that all student athletes have their assigned sex at birth confirmed by a healthcare professional
|
Only students entering female-only competition need verification (Sec. 3(2)). Boys and open teams are unaffected, and the basis is biological sex.
|
factual-firm | No | major | No | blind coder |
Uncorrected as of 2026-10-30.
|
| B37 | 2026-10-30 | seattletimes.com |
(section on 'where research about the athletic performance of trans girls stands') Harper: 'no compelling evidence to support otherwise'; 'trans women ... don't perform athletically like men'
|
Section promises the state of the research but quotes only Harper and Redfield. It omits the reviews finding retained strength, muscle and lean mass after suppression (Hilton & Lundberg 2021; Harper et al. 2021) and that WA requires no suppression, so most post-puberty trans girls in WA keep the full male advantage.
|
unchecked | No | major | No | blind coder | — |
| B38 | 2026-10-30 | seattletimes.com |
Headline: 'What's at stake as WA votes on trans girls' participation in youth sports'
|
I-638 covers K-12 interschool athletics only.
|
framing | No | minor | No | blind coder |
Minor: "youth sports".
|
| B39 | 2026-10-30 | seattletimes.com |
would ban transgender girls from participating with cisgender girls in athletic programs at public K-12 schools
|
Also covers WIAA private member schools (ST 2026-10-27: 'public and some private').
|
neutral | Neutral | minor | No | blind coder |
Low confidence.
|
11 field definitions
| Field | Type | Meaning | Units | Value type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
id |
string | Stable item id. B = found by the blind second coder; P = found in the primary audit, the symmetry test or the red-team review. | — | observed |
date |
date | Publication date of the story (YYYY-MM-DD). | — | observed |
url |
string | The story's URL. For row B7 the section page is given instead, because the story URL contains a minor's name. | — | observed |
quote |
string | The coded wording, quoted or closely described from the story. Headlines and omissions are marked as such; ellipses mark cuts. | — | observed |
whats_true |
string | What the record shows, with the record named (measure text section, official statistic, study, or the paper's own later reporting). | — | derived |
category |
string | factual-firm: false in the paper's own voice on a plain reading of the record. factual-arguable: unsupported or materially imprecise in the paper's voice, with a defensible alternative reading. framing: the paper's wording overstates, hedges or contradicts what the record plainly shows. unchecked: a quote from a source that the story printed without checking a claim the record contradicts (not the paper's own words). neutral: an error that favors neither side. excluded: reviewed and not counted, with the reason in note. | — | derived |
favors |
string | Which side of the I-638 debate the item's error or framing helps: No (opponents of the measure), Yes (supporters) or Neutral. | — | derived |
severity |
string | major or minor: whether the item bears on a central argument of either campaign. | — | derived |
correction |
string | Whether the Times corrected the item as of October 30, 2026: Yes, No (with any correction note that covers something else), or n/a. | — | observed |
found_by |
string | Which review step found the item: blind coder, primary audit, symmetry test or red team. | — | observed |
note |
string | Adjudication notes, including the reason for each excluded item; empty when none. | — | derived |