Independent fact-checking

Evidence you can inspect. Answers you can share.

Myth or fact? Tap to find out.

Four claims from the archive. A new set every day.

“Over the last 90 years, Washingtonians have rejected an income tax ten times” Tap to reveal
Mostly true

Voters rejected ten income-tax measures from 1934 to 2010, but approved one in 1932 that courts struck down.

Read the evidence
“Vaccines cause autism” Tap to reveal
False

Large cohort studies, including 657,461 Danish children, found no link between vaccination and autism.

Read the evidence
“It bans parents from using birth certificates” Tap to reveal
Misleading

The text never mentions birth certificates; it requires a provider's verification, which an original birth record might arguably support.

Read the evidence
“Using Tide laundry detergent causes cancer” Tap to reveal
False

EPA found no unreasonable risk to people using laundry detergents; its 1,4-dioxane concern is contaminated drinking water.

Read the evidence

Why FactHub is different

  • Check it yourself

    Every rating comes with its evidence, the limits of that evidence, and the sources, archived so they don’t vanish.

    See an example
  • Think we’re wrong? Prove it.

    Send counter-evidence. Every change is a new numbered version, and the old ones stay readable.

    Send evidence
  • Audited in public

    Independent auditors grade every version, and their findings stay on the record.

    Meet the auditors
  • Data, not just words

    Open datasets and charts break complicated questions into pieces you can see.

    Browse datasets

More fact-checks

Briefing Washington I-638 (2026)

I-638: what it does, and what each side claims

Initiative 638 would limit girls-only school competition in Washington to students the measure defines as biologically female, verified by each girl's health care provider. This briefing lays out what the measure does, every checkable claim each campaign made in the voters' pamphlet, and FactHub's fact checks of them.

Briefing Washington I-645 (2026)

I-645: what it does, and what each side claims

Initiative 645 would repeal Washington's 9.9% tax on household income over $1 million and bar state and local income taxes. This briefing lays out what the measure does, every checkable claim each campaign made in the voters' pamphlet, and FactHub's fact checks of them.

Washington I-645 (2026) · 10 min read

Most No on 645 money comes from unions paid through the state budget.

Claim “Most of the money opposing I-645 comes from unions whose members' pay is set in contracts funded largely from the general fund this tax would feed; the state refused one of them 2027-29 raises, citing a shortfall, and proposed a wage freeze for another” True