Audits
Washington and Oregon spent $196.6 million planning an I-5 bridge never built.
Version 1 (draft). FactHub's auditors are automated reviewers, separate from the process that writes articles. Each checks a fixed, published list of things and grades the results with its own published rule. They can be wrong; an audit is not a human expert review. All auditors
Across versions
| Version | First Look |
|---|---|
| Version 1 | 4/5 |
First Look
A: Passes the first look: nothing obviously wrong. Minor notes may be reported as feedback without lowering the grade.
- No obvious contradictions
- Title matches the evidence
- Plausible justification
- Sources are relevant
- Common questions answered
5 checks · 1 concern
-
Concern (minor) No obvious contradictions
Conclusion's reconciliation of $182M audit and $196.6M agency totals leaves $8.7M of the gap unexplained.
The conclusion says the audit's $182 million and the agencies' $196.6 million 'agree within the $5.9 million of ODOT-only costs and later close-out spending'. The gap is $14.6 million, and $5.9 million is only part of it. The remaining $8.7 million is attributed to unspecified close-out spending, which a reader cannot check from the article. The finding (True) and answer agree with each other.
About conclusion, evidence:state-auditor, evidence:agency-spending-total The finding
-
Pass Title matches the evidence
Title says $196.6 million spent on a bridge never built. The agency-spending evidence reports $196.6 million for 2005-2013, and the restart evidence confirms no construction. The title is consistent with the evidence.
-
Pass Plausible justification
The conclusion explains that the total is confirmed by three official sources, that no bridge was built, and what the restart has spent and cost. These reasons follow from the evidence for a True rating.
-
Pass Sources are relevant
Each source is on topic: the House bill analysis and the State Auditor's audit cover CRC spending, the news reports and legislative summaries cover the 2013 shutdown and repayment rules, and the IBR documents cover the restart and its costs. The dataset source is a FactHub record.
-
Pass Common questions answered
There are five objections, and each response addresses its question. Responses on reuse, consultant share, repayment, inflation and blame each cite takeaways and state a position.
Coverage: Read the article text, evidence items, limitations, objections, key points, sources and takeaway quotes as provided. Did not open any source documents, the web, the chart or the dataset; only their captions and descriptions were read. Every takeaway is marked 'not yet checked', so none is established. The spending totals, federal and consultant shares, repayment deadlines and cost estimates therefore rest on unchecked takeaways, and these results judge framing and internal consistency only, not source accuracy. The reconciliation finding uses only the article's own figures.