Audits
Washington's jobless rate tied for highest only in June 2026; it now ranks sixth.
Version 2 (draft). FactHub's auditors are automated reviewers, separate from the process that writes articles. Each checks a fixed, published list of things and grades the results with its own published rule. They can be wrong; an audit is not a human expert review. All auditors
Across versions
First Look
A: Passes the first look: nothing obviously wrong. Minor notes may be reported as feedback without lowering the grade.
- Title matches the evidence
- No obvious contradictions
- Plausible justification
- Sources are relevant
- Common questions answered
5 checks
-
Pass Title matches the evidence
The title's 'tied for highest only in June 2026' matches the June evidence, and 'now ranks sixth' matches the September data released October 20, before the October 21 publication date.
-
Pass No obvious contradictions
The Misleading finding, answer, conclusion and key points agree. The July (fourth), August (fifth) and September (sixth) rankings are stated consistently across sections. The national rate appears as about 4.1 to 4.2 percent and 4.2 percent, which is compatible.
-
Pass Plausible justification
The conclusion explains that a true one-month tie was presented as the current ranking without a date, after newer releases showed Washington lower. That reason supports Misleading rather than False.
-
Pass Sources are relevant
The campaign home page is the subject of the claim, the BLS state releases and table are the official data for the rankings, and the Seattle Times editorial is cited only as a labeled comparison for a similar correction.
-
Pass Common questions answered
There are four objections. Each response addresses its question: the June tie, the D.C. exclusion, the current standing of Washington at sixth, and the tax causation claim, which the response says the article does not test.
Coverage: I read only the article payload and the sources block. I did not open archives, BLS releases, the Seattle Times editorial, or the Wikimedia image. Every takeaway in the sources block is marked 'not yet checked', so I treated the article's factual statements as unchecked and judged only internal consistency and whether each response addresses its question. The payload labels key points as established while the sources block says not yet checked; I did not rely on that label. Not verified: D.C. rates for July and August, the April 2029 tax payment date, the national rate figures, and the Washington 4.4 percent early-2025 figure.