FactHub saved analysis

Rent growth 2019-2024 vs. change in homelessness, large CoCs

Did CoCs whose rents rose faster from 2019 to 2024 see larger increases in homelessness?

Coverage: 2015-2025 (PIT count years; no ACS 1-year data for 2020)

Node: dataset:homelessness-rate-vs-rent:1:analysis:rent-growth-vs-change

Contained in Homelessness rate vs. rent in 67 large U.S. Continuums of Care, 2015-2025.

What this dataset measures

Large urban CoCs whose boundaries can be rebuilt from whole Census counties or places, so each homeless count can be matched to the population and rents of the same area. Built to test the common explanation that high housing costs account for Seattle/King County's homelessness.

Supporting files

Source snapshots, manifests, quality reports, documentation, and other materials used to produce or review this release.

  • build_and_analyze.js Transformation manifest · text/javascript · 11.8 KB (12,057 bytes)

    Node.js script that builds coc-panel from the HUD PIT sheets and ACS JSON and fits the per-year regressions.

  • xlsb_to_csv.ps1 Transformation manifest · text/x-powershell · 977 bytes

    PowerShell script that exports each sheet of the HUD .xlsb workbook to CSV through Excel with macros disabled.

  • build_rate_rent.js Transformation manifest · text/javascript · 8.2 KB (8,372 bytes)

    Node.js script that computes king-residuals and the saved analyses (leave-one-out fits, prediction intervals, rent-growth correlations).

  • peers.js Transformation manifest · text/javascript · 10.2 KB (10,432 bytes)

    Node.js script that builds peer-changes (z-scored distances, 2019-to-latest changes, rent growth).

  • findings.md Documentation · text/markdown · 14 KB (14,292 bytes)

    Method notes, results tables and caveats for the panel and regressions.

  • findings-peers.md Documentation · text/markdown · 16.5 KB (16,944 bytes)

    Method notes, results and caveats for the peer comparison, including peers' count-method changes.

Saved analyses

Rent growth 2019-2024 vs. change in homelessness, large CoCs

Question: Did CoCs whose rents rose faster from 2019 to 2024 see larger increases in homelessness?

Result: Rent growth 2019-24 vs % change in total homelessness rate: r = -0.043 (95% CI -0.282 to 0.201); Rent growth 2019-24 vs % change in unsheltered rate: r = -0.007 (95% CI -0.249 to 0.235); Rent growth 2019-24 vs change in total rate per 10,000: r = -0.135 (95% CI -0.366 to 0.11)

Operation: Pearson correlation across CoCs, King County excluded

Scope: 66 large CoCs other than King County

Estimates with uncertainty
EstimateValueUncertaintyMethodn
Rent growth 2019-24 vs % change in total homelessness rate -0.043 Pearson correlation coefficient (95% CI -0.282 to 0.201) 95% confidence interval Pearson r across large CoCs excluding King County; 95% CI by Fisher z-transform 66
Rent growth 2019-24 vs % change in unsheltered rate -0.007 Pearson correlation coefficient (95% CI -0.249 to 0.235) 95% confidence interval Pearson r across large CoCs excluding King County; 95% CI by Fisher z-transform 66
Rent growth 2019-24 vs change in total rate per 10,000 -0.135 Pearson correlation coefficient (95% CI -0.366 to 0.11) 95% confidence interval Pearson r across large CoCs excluding King County; 95% CI by Fisher z-transform 66

View this analysis

  • ACS median gross rent includes long-tenure leases and lags asking rents.
  • Tests only whether changes in rent explain changes in homelessness; rent level remains the strongest cross-sectional correlate.
  • Several CoCs changed count methods between 2019 and their end year.

Sources

  1. HUD, 2007-2025 Point-in-Time Counts by CoC (AHAR Part 1 data) Homeless counts (total, sheltered, unsheltered) and count type for each CoC and year. Downloaded from the Internet Archive snapshot because huduser.gov blocks scripted requests; contentDigest is the SHA-256 of that downloaded workbook (8,859,426 bytes).

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. U.S. government work (public domain). Public domain; not rehosted here. Retrieve from HUD or the archived copy.

    Archived copy captured May 30, 2026

  2. U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-year estimates, tables B01003, B25064, B25004, B25003 (2015-2019, 2021-2024) Population, median gross rent and rental vacancy for the counties and places that make up each CoC.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. U.S. government work (public domain). Public domain; values used are in coc-panel.

    Archived copy captured May 21, 2026

  3. KCRHA, 2024 Point-in-Time Count FAQ v2 Documents King County's respondent-driven sampling (RDS) method from 2022 and the 2024 revision to 16,868.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. Public agency document. Linked, not rehosted.

    Archived copy captured October 10, 2026

  4. Almquist ZW et al., "Innovating a community-driven enumeration and needs assessment of people experiencing homelessness," American Journal of Epidemiology 194(6), 2024 Only quantitative comparison of King County's 2022 RDS estimate with a forecast of the old visual-count method; basis for the method-adjustment sensitivity range.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. Open-access journal article. Linked, not rehosted.

    Archived copy captured October 10, 2026

Limitations and reproducibility

Reproducible from public sources: Download the HUD workbook and ACS tables listed in sources, export the workbook sheets with xlsb-export-script, then run build-panel-script, peers-script and residuals-script (Node.js). Outputs match the tables here.

  • PIT counts are single January nights; methods vary by CoC and change over time.
  • King County changed its unsheltered count method in 2022 (respondent-driven sampling). The estimated effect ranges from 0 to about 3,600 people in 2024.
  • Rates per 10,000 are FactHub calculations. HUD does not publish CoC-level rates.
  • CoC boundaries are rebuilt from whole Census geographies with small gaps (see coc-geography).
  • Multi-county median rent is a renter-weighted average of county medians, not a true median.
  • Rent alone explains 2-14% of the variation in total rates across all 67 CoCs (24-45% among Major City CoCs).
  • All results are associations, not causal estimates.

Publications using this dataset

Version details

The exact citing versions, and the version of this dataset each cites.

  • Article seattle-homelessness-spending-results — version 5 (published) cites version 1
  • Article seattle-homelessness-spending-results — version 4 (published) cites version 1
  • Article seattle-homelessness-spending-results — version 3 (published) cites version 1
  • Article seattle-homelessness-spending-results — version 2 (published) cites version 1
  • Dataset homeless-system-performance — version 1 (published) cites version 1
  • Dataset king-county-homeless-count-beds — version 2 (published) cites version 1