Permanent and temporary beds per 10,000 residents, 2015 vs. 2024, selected CoCs
Question: How did King County's growth in permanent and temporary capacity per resident compare with other large CoCs?
Result: Seattle/King County: permanent 35.1 to 48.1 (+13.1); temporary 30.5 to 29.9; New York City: permanent 34.2 to 67.1 (+32.9); temporary 87.8 to 132.5; Boston: permanent 98.7 to 120.6 (+21.9); temporary 95.1 to 103; Houston/Harris/Fort Bend/Montgomery: permanent 7.6 to 16.2 (+8.6); temporary 5.3 to 4.5; San Diego: permanent 11.1 to 35.3 (+24.3); temporary 14 to 17.4; Metro Denver: permanent 8.5 to 32.8 (+24.4); temporary 15.7 to 25.5; Dallas/Collin: permanent 9.3 to 13.4 (+4.1); temporary 10.4 to 8.6; Los Angeles (excl. Long Beach/Pasadena/Glendale): permanent 20.8 to 41.2 (+20.4); temporary 15.2 to 29.6; San Francisco: permanent 90.2 to 198 (+107.7); temporary 29.2 to 52.8; Portland/Multnomah: permanent 57.2 to 117 (+59.8); temporary 21.2 to 48; Median of 67 CoCs: permanent 16.9 to 27.9 (+8.2); temporary 14.5 to 15
Operation: perm_beds_per_10k and temp_beds_per_10k, 2015 and 2024
Scope: Selected large CoCs and the 67-CoC median
- HIC counts beds that exist on the count night, not whether they were staffed or occupied.
- King County switched its unsheltered count to respondent-driven sampling in 2022; counts before and after are not directly comparable.
- Comparison set chosen to include the regions named in the accompanying article; the full panel is in hic-panel.