What this dataset measures
These are the two most-cited bodies of evidence on whether testosterone suppression removes the male athletic advantage: before-and-after clinical studies, gathered in the Harper et al. (2021) systematic review, and the only study of real fitness-test performance over time (Roberts et al. 2021). Using every adult 12-month study group in the review, rather than one study, avoids picking a favorable result.
- Geography
- United States, Europe
- Unit of observation
- Study group and measure; fitness measure and time band
- Update cadence
- As new before-and-after studies are published
- Curator
- FactHub Research Team
Supporting files
Source snapshots, manifests, quality reports, documentation,
and other materials used to produce or review this release.
-
analyses.json
Derived table · application/json · 16.7 KB (17,090 bytes)
Every saved-analysis result in this dataset, as computed by build.js.
-
build.js
Transformation manifest · text/javascript · 4.2 KB (4,317 bytes)
Node.js script that computes every saved analysis from the two curated tables.
Saved analyses
How much faster transgender women in the Air Force ran 1.5 miles than the average woman, by time on hormones
Question: How much faster than the average Air Force woman under 30 did transgender women run 1.5 miles before and during hormone treatment?
Result: Transgender women ran 1.5 miles 147 seconds faster than the average Air Force woman before hormones (20.8% faster), 97 s after under a year, 64 s at 1-2 years and 90 s at 2-2.5 years (95% CI 10 to 169; 11.8% faster).
Operation: Table 4 differences from the average woman, sign reversed so faster is positive; speed advantage = average woman's time / transgender women's time - 1.
Scope: 46 transgender women in the U.S. Air Force, 2016-2018 records.
Estimates with uncertainty
| Estimate | Value | Uncertainty | Method | n |
| averageWomanSeconds: 855, speedAdvantagePct: 20.8, timeOnHormones: Year 0 (before), transWomenSeconds: 708 |
147 seconds faster than the average Air Force woman over 1.5 miles (95% CI 121 to 173) |
95% confidence interval |
Roberts et al. (2021) Table 4 mean difference from the average Air Force woman under 30, sign reversed so faster is positive; 95% CI from the paper. |
— |
| averageWomanSeconds: 855, speedAdvantagePct: 12.8, timeOnHormones: Year 0-1, transWomenSeconds: 758 |
97 seconds faster than the average Air Force woman over 1.5 miles (95% CI 70 to 124) |
95% confidence interval |
Roberts et al. (2021) Table 4 mean difference from the average Air Force woman under 30, sign reversed so faster is positive; 95% CI from the paper. |
— |
| averageWomanSeconds: 855, speedAdvantagePct: 8.1, timeOnHormones: Year 1-2, transWomenSeconds: 791 |
64 seconds faster than the average Air Force woman over 1.5 miles (95% CI 26 to 101) |
95% confidence interval |
Roberts et al. (2021) Table 4 mean difference from the average Air Force woman under 30, sign reversed so faster is positive; 95% CI from the paper. |
— |
| averageWomanSeconds: 855, speedAdvantagePct: 11.8, timeOnHormones: Year 2-2.5, transWomenSeconds: 765 |
90 seconds faster than the average Air Force woman over 1.5 miles (95% CI 10 to 169) |
95% confidence interval |
Roberts et al. (2021) Table 4 mean difference from the average Air Force woman under 30, sign reversed so faster is positive; 95% CI from the paper. |
— |
View this analysis
- Air Force members, not competitive athletes; fitness tests measure endurance, not maximal speed.
- The comparison is an Air Force-wide average for women under 30, not matched controls; training was not recorded.
- Few women reached the 2-2.5 year band, so its confidence interval is wide (10 to 169 seconds).
- Results may differ for people who began treatment early in puberty, as the authors note.
Sources
-
Harper J, O'Donnell E, Sorouri Khorashad B, McDermott H, Witcomb GL (British Journal of Sports Medicine)
Systematic review, Tables 2-5: per-study changes in lean body mass, muscle cross-sectional area, strength and hemoglobin or hematocrit, with each study's testosterone before and after treatment, in transgender women on hormones.
Free copy
Retrieved November 5, 2026. CC BY 4.0. Open access under CC BY 4.0; FactHub republishes the extracted numbers with attribution.
Reliability:
Peer-reviewed study.
Peer-reviewed systematic review of 24 studies of non-athletic transgender women, from Loughborough University and partners; no specific funding and no competing interests declared.
-
Roberts TA, Smalley J, Ahrendt D (British Journal of Sports Medicine)
Table 4: U.S. Air Force fitness-test push-ups, sit-ups and 1.5-mile run times of 46 transgender women before and during hormone treatment, compared with the average Air Force woman and man under 30.
Retrieved November 5, 2026. Copyright BMJ; numbers reported as facts. FactHub republishes the table's means, differences and confidence intervals as facts, with attribution; the article text is not redistributed.
Reliability:
Peer-reviewed study.
Peer-reviewed study of U.S. Air Force medical and fitness records, 2004-2018, by military and academic pediatricians; no specific grant. Fitness tests measure endurance, not maximal strength, and the comparison is to an Air Force average, not matched controls.
-
Scharff M, Wiepjes CM, Klaver M, Schreiner T, T'Sjoen G, den Heijer M (Endocrine Connections)
Cross-check of the largest 12-month study group: 249 transgender women in the European ENIGI cohort, grip strength 41.8 kg before and 40.0 kg after 1 year; median testosterone 17.9-18.5 nmol/L before and 0.4-0.8 nmol/L during treatment by clinic (Table 1).
Free copy
Retrieved November 5, 2026. CC BY 4.0. Open access; numbers republished with attribution.
Reliability:
Peer-reviewed study.
Multicenter prospective clinical cohort in Amsterdam, Ghent and Oslo; authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
Wiik A, Lundberg TR, et al. (Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism)
Cross-check of the Wiik study group: thigh muscle volume fell 5% and quadriceps cross-sectional area 4% in 11 transgender women after 12 months, while strength was maintained.
Retrieved November 5, 2026. Copyright Endocrine Society; numbers reported as facts. Numbers republished as facts with attribution.
Reliability:
Peer-reviewed study.
Prospective study of 11 untrained transgender women at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; funded by Stockholm County Council and two foundations; no conflicts declared.
License: FactHub's selection, cleaning and combined tables are
licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Source data keeps the terms listed above (terms).
Limitations and reproducibility
Reproducible from public sources: Both curated tables are transcribed from published tables (Harper et al. 2021, Tables 2-5; Roberts et al. 2021, Table 4). build.js computes every saved analysis from them. The largest 12-month group (Scharff 2019) and the Wiik 2020 group were cross-checked against the original papers.
- Nearly all participants were adults, and none were competitive athletes. No before-and-after study has measured athletic performance in transgender girls.
- The 12-month medians count each study group once, regardless of size, and pool different muscles and strength tests.
- The Air Force comparison is to an average woman, not to matched women with the same training.
- Changes after 12 months are not charted; the review found too few studies to say whether losses continue.
Publications using this dataset
Version details
The exact citing versions, and the version of this dataset each cites.
-
Article
trans-girls-athletic-advantage —
version 3
(published) cites version 1
-
Article
trans-girls-athletic-advantage —
version 2
(published) cites version 1
-
Chart
hormones-year-testosterone-vs-strength —
version 1
(published) cites version 1
-
Chart
air-force-run-gap-on-hormones —
version 1
(published) cites version 1
Node: dataset:testosterone-suppression-athletic-measures:1:analysis:air-force-run-gap