FactHub saved analysis

Male vs. female physical traits

How large are sex differences in sport-relevant physical traits, and do they appear before puberty?

Coverage: Olympic results July-August 2024; Washington state meet May 28-30, 2026; trait data 1988-2018

Node: dataset:sex-gap-sports-performance:1:analysis:traits-gap

Contained in Male and female athletic performance and physical traits.

What this dataset measures

Running, jumping and swimming events are contested identically by both sexes, so marks can be compared directly. The Washington state meet shows the gap among high-school athletes in the state where the girls' sports initiative IL26-638 is on the ballot; the Olympics show it among the best adults in the world. Physical-trait data come from large government surveys and peer-reviewed studies.

Supporting files

Source snapshots, manifests, quality reports, documentation, and other materials used to produce or review this release.

  • analyses.json Derived table · application/json · 19.2 KB (19,659 bytes)

    Results of every saved analysis (olyGap, wiaaGap, h2h, chartRows, traits), as computed by build.js.

  • build.js Transformation manifest · text/javascript · 8.9 KB (9,128 bytes)

    Node.js script that parses the extracted WIAA results text, writes the three CSV tables, and computes every saved-analysis result.

  • pdftext.js Transformation manifest · text/javascript · 1.3 KB (1,364 bytes)

    Node.js script used to extract text from the WIAA results PDF (inflates the PDF content streams and prints the text operators).

Saved analyses

Male vs. female physical traits

Question: How large are sex differences in sport-relevant physical traits, and do they appear before puberty?

Result: Adult men have about 9% greater height, 57% more skeletal muscle, 64% stronger grip, 43% more hip bone mineral, 17% more hemoglobin and 28% higher aerobic capacity. Before puberty the measured differences are 0-7%.

Operation: Transcribe published male and female values and compute the percentage difference.

Scope: 18 measures from 8 sources.

View this analysis

  • Sources differ in era, country and age range; heart data are from adults aged 45-74.
  • The Olympic reaction-time difference is probably mostly a starting-block sensor artifact, according to its authors; a 2015 laboratory study of 1,469 U.S. adults (Woods et al.) found simple reaction time unaffected by sex.

Sources

  1. Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA) Official results of the 2026 State 2A-3A-4A Track and Field Championships, Mount Tahoma Stadium, Tacoma, May 28-30, 2026 (Hy-Tek Meet Manager printout, linked from wiaa.com Track & Field Past Results).

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. Factual results published by WIAA; no license stated. Marks are facts; FactHub republishes places and marks only, without athlete names or schools.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  2. World Athletics Official Paris 2024 athletics results by discipline; each final links to its result page. FactHub spot-checked the women's 400m and 800m and men's pole vault finals against it.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. World Athletics website terms. Marks are facts; linked, not redistributed.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  3. Wikipedia Compiled medal summary for all Paris 2024 athletics events, used to transcribe gold-medal marks.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. CC BY-SA 4.0. Marks are facts; transcribed values only.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  4. Wikipedia Compiled medal summary for Paris 2024 pool swimming events, used to transcribe gold-medal times.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. CC BY-SA 4.0. Marks are facts; transcribed values only.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  5. CDC National Center for Health Statistics Fryar CD et al. Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2015-2018. Vital Health Stat 3(46), 2021. Mean standing height by sex and age.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. Public domain (U.S. government work). Unrestricted.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  6. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM, Ross R (2000) Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr, measured by whole-body MRI. J Appl Physiol 89:81-88.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. Publisher copyright (American Physiological Society). Values cited from the abstract; not redistributed.

  7. Dodds RM et al. (2014) Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies (49,964 participants). PLoS One 9:e113637, Table 2.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. CC BY 4.0. Redistributable with attribution.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  8. CDC National Center for Health Statistics Looker AC et al. Lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and bone area: United States, 2005-2008. Vital Health Stat 11(251), 2012; total femur tables.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. Public domain (U.S. government work). Unrestricted.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  9. CDC National Center for Health Statistics Hollowell JG et al. Hematological and iron-related analytes: reference data for persons aged 1 year and over, United States, 1988-94. Vital Health Stat 11(247), 2005; Tables 2-3.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. Public domain (U.S. government work). Unrestricted.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  10. Petersen SE et al. (2017) Reference ranges for cardiac structure and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Caucasians from the UK Biobank (n=804). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:18.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. CC BY 4.0. Redistributable with attribution.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  11. Kaminsky LA et al. (2015) Reference standards for cardiorespiratory fitness measured with cardiopulmonary exercise testing: data from the FRIEND registry (7,783 U.S. treadmill tests). Mayo Clin Proc 90:1515.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. Publisher copyright; author manuscript in PMC. Values cited; not redistributed.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  12. Lipps DB, Galecki AT, Ashton-Miller JA (2011) On the implications of a sex difference in the reaction times of sprinters at the Beijing Olympics. PLoS One 6:e26141.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. CC BY. Redistributable with attribution.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

  13. Woods DL et al. (2015) Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time (1,469 U.S. adults, precisely timed hardware). Front Hum Neurosci 9:131. Reports simple reaction time unaffected by sex.

    Retrieved October 10, 2026. CC BY 4.0. Redistributable with attribution.

    Archived copy captured October 11, 2026

Limitations and reproducibility

Reproducible: The WIAA PDF is archived and digested; build.js and pdftext.js regenerate every table and saved analysis from it. Olympic and trait values are transcribed from the linked sources.

  • Only events contested identically by both sexes are compared; hurdles and throws are excluded.
  • No athlete in these tables is known to be using hormone treatment. Olympians are drug-tested; high-school athletes are not routinely tested.
  • Marks from a single meet are affected by wind, weather and tactics.
  • Trait data come from different populations and years and are not from athletes.

Publications using this dataset

Version details

The exact citing versions, and the version of this dataset each cites.

  • Article boys-girls-sports-performance-gap — version 5 (published) cites version 2
  • Article boys-girls-sports-performance-gap — version 4 (published) cites version 2
  • Article boys-girls-sports-performance-gap — version 2 (published) cites version 1
  • Article boys-girls-sports-performance-gap — version 1 (published) cites version 1
  • Chart sex-gap-swimming-by-age — version 1 (published) cites version 2
  • Chart sex-gap-olympic-vs-wa-champions — version 1 (published) cites version 1
  • Dataset wa-girls-mile-record-vs-boys — version 2 (published) cites version 2