Coded I-645 stories
One row per story about I-645 published June 1 to Oct 21, 2026 by 26 Washington and national outlets, coded with one codebook (media_coding_codebook.md).
Unit of observation: One news story, explainer, broadcast write-up, opinion piece or editorial
i645_media_coding.csv
text/csv · 107.7 KB (110,330 bytes)
| story_id | outlet | outlet_detail | outlet_group | date | author | headline | url | read_status | type | yes_sources count | no_sources count | neutral_sources count | first_word | last_word | rebuttal | headline_term | loaded_terms | no_claims_unchecked | yes_claims_unchecked | claims_checked | O1 0/1 | O2 0/1 | O3a 0/1 | O3b 0/1 | O4 0/1 | O5 0/1 | O6 0/1 | O7 0/1 | O8 0/1 | O9 0/1 | O3b_voice | O4_voice | has_error 0/1 | errors | ballot_sentence | dhm_poll | key_quote | sources_detail | notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | Lynnwood Times | Lynnwood Times | conservative | 2026-08-26 | Mario Lotmore |
'Vote Yes Repeal the Income Tax' campaign launched to ax WA's new statewide income tax
|
lynnwoodtimes.com | full | news | 6 | 4 | 1 | yes | yes | N |
"statewide income tax"
|
none from list ("ax")
|
N13B | YCOME;YLEAVE | YUNCON | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | — | advocate | 1 |
Lede says repeal comes "before collections begin in 2028". Collections begin in 2029 (the tax applies from 1/1/2028; payments are due April 2029). The story later says "before it collects a dollar". No correction found.
|
none | N |
"I-645's extra ban on any tax 'measured by' individual income is written so broadly that a later court could treat wage-based programs as income taxes"
|
yes: 6 (Gordon; Herrera Beutler; Keller; McKenna; Herzberg/LGW; Gregoire); no: 4 (Ferguson; WEA Delaney; SEIU Glickman; opponents on "measured by"); neutral: 1 (DOR Jennrich)
|
**The only conservative-outlet story with O9** (with Herzberg's rebuttal). O4 comes via the Yes side (Gordon: Ferguson "signed an $80 billion budget built on income-tax revenue that does not arrive until 2029"). O7: about 95% union, and No $5.2M vs Yes $3.7M. It is a campaign-launch piece, and the six Yes voices dominate.
|
| M1 | MyNorthwest/KIRO Newsradio | MyNorthwest / KIRO Newsradio | conservative | 2026-07-14 | Julia Dallas |
'He has struck out': Ferguson says voters will reject Heywood's millionaires' tax repeal as advocates warn of billions in education cuts
|
mynorthwest.com | full | news | 1 | 4 | 0 | no | no | N |
"millionaires' tax repeal"
|
Q:hole ("$13 billion hole", subhead in quotes); headline "education cuts" attributed
|
N13B;N460K | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"Dr. Soleil Boyd ... said if Initiative 645 is passed, it will blow a "$13 billion hole" in the state's budget."
|
yes: 1 (Heywood, on signatures); no: 4 (Ferguson; Boyd/Children's Alliance; Kirschner; Davis/Food Lifeline); neutral: 0
|
**Symmetry check:** KIRO news let No-side claims run with no 2029 timing, no relief-survives fact and no Yes response on cuts. Every omission is 0.
|
| M2 | MyNorthwest/KIRO Newsradio | MyNorthwest / KIRO (John Curley Show) | conservative | 2026-07-16 | John Curley |
'I've spent over $10M on these initiatives': Heywood reveals why he won't stop fighting WA's millionaires' tax
|
mynorthwest.com | full | broadcast | 1 | 1 | 1 | yes | yes | NA |
"millionaires' tax"
|
none
|
— | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Misspells Heywood as "Haywood"/"Hayward". Says the press conference was "Wednesday" (it was Tuesday 7/14). Says "308,911 votes" (it means signatures).
|
none | N |
"Well, Brian Hayward is spending his own money because he's going to save so much money," Curley joked.
|
yes: 1 (Heywood); no: 1 (Ferguson, paraphrase); neutral: 1 (Supreme Court ruling)
|
**The only story in this set that raises O8**, via the host's joke. Heywood answers that he would need "$250 million just to break even".
|
| M3 | MyNorthwest/KIRO Newsradio | MyNorthwest / KIRO opinion | conservative | 2026-09-09 | John Curley Show |
'It's coming for everybody': Curley urges YES on I-645 after Supreme Court deadlock keeps disputed ballot language
|
mynorthwest.com | full | opinion | 3 | 0 | 1 | none | none | NA |
other: "I-645"
|
none
|
— | YCOME | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
critiqued | N |
"Everybody knows it's coming for everybody."
|
yes: 3 (Curley; Heywood; WPC); no: 0; neutral: 1 (Supreme Court)
|
Cites "66% of Washingtonians" believe the tax will expand, with no poll source.
|
| M4 | MyNorthwest/KIRO Newsradio | MyNorthwest / KIRO Newsradio | conservative | 2026-10-09 | Luke Duecy |
Washington millionaires tax debate: Initiative 645 contrasts $3B in revenue v. fears of broader taxes
|
mynorthwest.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 0 | no | yes | Y |
"millionaires tax"
|
none
|
NBREAK;N13B | — | YCOME | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
mentioned | N |
"This is an attempt by a handful of the wealthiest people in our state to give themselves a $13 billion tax break"
|
yes: 1 (Herrera Beutler); no: 1 (Sims/WSLC); neutral: 0
|
Already in §7. Balanced on YCOME but not on NBREAK. "Lawmakers ... not to pass a proposal that would have locked the $1 million threshold" hints at O5 but is not explicit (coded 0).
|
| M5 | MyNorthwest/KIRO Newsradio | MyNorthwest / KIRO (Curley Show, guest host Angela Poe Russell) | conservative | 2026-10-12 | John Curley Show |
WA Rep. Berg: 'No intention' of lowering Washington millionaires tax threshold despite controversial remarks
|
mynorthwest.com | full | broadcast | 1 | 1 | 0 | no | no | Y |
"millionaires tax"
|
Q:unconstitutional (WAGOP post)
|
— | — | YUNCON | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none found. Unverified reporter-voice claim: the I-2111 exemption "applies only as long as the standard deduction is at least $1 million per household". If true, this is relevant to O5 and should be checked.
|
mentioned | N |
"There's really not a lot of ways to constrain future legislators"
|
yes: 1 (WAGOP video/post); no: 1 (Rep. Berg); neutral: 0
|
**Best practice:** a Democratic legislator concedes O5 on a conservative-leaning show, and the host presses both sides.
|
| M6 | MyNorthwest/KIRO Newsradio | MyNorthwest / KIRO opinion | conservative | 2026-10-14 | Jake Skorheim and Spike O'Neill Show |
'Just go away': Jake urges lawmakers to abandon WA's millionaires' tax as debate raises concerns about future expansion
|
mynorthwest.com | full | opinion | 2 | 0 | 0 | none | none | NA |
"millionaires' tax"
|
none
|
— | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"Don't make it for a billion. Don't make it for 10 billion. Just go away."
|
yes: 2 (Heywood; Jake); no: 0 (Dhingra named, not quoted); neutral: 0
|
Low substance. Co-host Spike pushes back ("I'd like to see genuine tax reform").
|
| M7 | MyNorthwest/KIRO Newsradio | MyNorthwest / KIRO opinion | conservative | 2026-10-18 | John Curley Show |
'You did a great job reading the script': Curley takes aim at Ken Jennings' arguments against repealing WA's income tax
|
mynorthwest.com | full | opinion | 1 | 2 | 0 | none | none | NA |
"income tax"
|
Q:scare ("Scare everybody into it")
|
— | YNOK12 | N13B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | not-classified-opinion | 1 |
**Window mismatch presented as a debunk:** "The state is forecasting $11.4 billion, so $13 billion, I'm sorry, we can't accept that". $11.4B is OFM FY27-31 and $13B is the fiscal note's FY29-32 gross, so both are valid. The write-up adds that NPI "did not explain" the gap but does not explain it either. No correction.
|
none | N |
"The state is forecasting $11.4 billion, so $13 billion, I'm sorry, we can't accept that."
|
yes: 1 (Curley); no: 2 (Jennings ad; NPI); neutral: 0
|
Curley partly concedes O4 ("It's the lawmakers' fault if they are spending money that they haven't had yet").
|
| S1 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red | conservative | 2026-07-16 | (page meta: Jason Rantz) |
Brian Heywood: Democrats lying about income tax repeal cuts
|
seattlered.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 1 | no | yes | N |
"income tax repeal"
|
"scare campaign" (subhead); "doomsday framing" (reporter voice); Q:"hostage situation"
|
— | YNOK12 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | fact | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"The doomsday framing has a timing problem too. The income tax does not begin generating revenue until 2029."
|
yes: 1 (Heywood); no: 1 (Ferguson/No launch, paraphrase); neutral: 1 (Cygnal poll)
|
The headline states "Democrats lying" as Heywood's claim, and nobody responds. The Cygnal 67-21 poll is reported with its sponsor named but not described as an anti-tax group.
|
| S2 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red | conservative | 2026-07-19 | (page meta: Jason Rantz) |
Heywood exposes push poll behind claims his initiative cuts school funding
|
seattlered.com | full | news | 1 | 0 | 0 | yes | yes | N |
other: "claims his initiative cuts school funding"
|
reporter voice: "the campaign to shape it dishonestly"
|
— | YNOK12 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"our initiative doesn't do anything with K through 12 funding. So if they write K through 12, it is a lie"
|
yes: 1 (Heywood); no: 0; neutral: 0
|
The strongest "no effect" claim, run with no context or response. The headline calls the poll a "push poll" in reporter voice and offers no evidence.
|
| S3 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red | conservative | 2026-08-10 | Jason Rantz |
A judge just rigged the WA income tax ballot
|
seattlered.com | full | opinion | 1 | 0 | 2 | none | none | NA |
"income tax"
|
"lie" (lies); "rigged"
|
— | YNOK12 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | not-classified-opinion | — | 0 |
none
|
critiqued | N |
"It is completely false since neither are funded by a tax that isn't even going to be collected until 2029."
|
yes: 1 (Heywood); no: 0; neutral: 2 (West; Judge Lanese)
|
O7: "Public sector unions, funded by your tax dollars, are bankrolling the campaign against repeal."
|
| S4 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red | conservative | 2026-09-04 | Jason Rantz |
Seattle Times counted heads, not dollars, on WA tax
|
seattlered.com | full | opinion | 0 | 1 | 1 | none | none | NA |
other: "WA tax"
|
"hole" ("will not cover the hole")
|
— | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | not-classified-opinion | 0 |
none. It implies a causal link between a Gig Harbor executive going public and a DOR audit notice, without evidence (insinuation, not a checkable error).
|
none | N |
"In its first year, the capital gains tax brought in $786 million, and the ten largest payments accounted for $394 million of it."
|
yes: 0; no: 1 (Kirschner); neutral: 1 (Cornell's Young)
|
**Best practice on O6** (revenue volatility, matches the anchor figures). O4: "they have committed the spending in advance."
|
| S5 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red | conservative | 2026-09-08 | (page meta: Jason Rantz) |
DocuSign founder urges yes on I-645 to kill WA income tax
|
seattlered.com | full | news | 4 | 1 | 0 | yes | yes | N |
"WA income tax"
|
"gut" (reporter voice: "arguing repeal would gut schools and health care")
|
— | YCOME | NVOTE | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"That prediction matches what critics have said since Senate Bill 6346 passed."
|
yes: 4 (Lorenzini; Gildon/LGW; Proudman; Oster); no: 1 (Ferguson and labor, paraphrase); neutral: 0
|
**Reporter voice endorses a certainty prediction** ("within a year or two"). The O5 framing is accurate. No No-side voice on the expansion claim.
|
| S6 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red | conservative | 2026-09-29 | Jason Rantz |
Jayapal's $300 billion I-645 income tax claim is a lie
|
seattlered.com | full | opinion | 1 | 1 | 1 | none | none | NA |
"income tax"
|
"lie"/"lying" (lies); "union-funded"
|
— | — | N300B;N13B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | not-classified-opinion | not-classified-opinion | 1 |
It calls the No side's $13B "a lie since the budget isn't built on a single penny collected from this tax". The same column later says Senate Democrats' four-year outlook "assumed income tax money would start flowing in 2029". The column contradicts itself, and the $13B is the fiscal note's FY29-32 gross figure.
|
none | N |
"which is also a lie since the budget isn't built on a single penny collected from this tax"
|
yes: 1 (WSRP Walsh); no: 1 (Jayapal; No on 645 paraphrase); neutral: 1 (OFM)
|
**Internal contradiction** on O4. The $300B debunk is correct and well sourced. O7: No $7.8M vs Yes $1.3M. Heywood and Freeman are named as "big donors" with no mention of their personal stake (O8=0).
|
| S7 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red (op-ed) | conservative | 2026-09-29 | Jason Mercier (Mountain States Policy Center) |
Why Washingtonians should vote to repeal state income tax
|
seattlered.com | full | opinion | 2 | 0 | 0 | none | none | NA |
"state income tax"
|
none
|
— | YCOME;YUNCON | N05 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"Washington voters should repeal the 'millionaire's tax' this November, which would hurt the state's competitive advantage and will eventually apply to everyone."
|
yes: 2 (author; AWB Johnson); no: 0; neutral: 0
|
Accurate O5 ("enacted as a regular statute"). "Several years to plan" implicitly concedes that future budgets would need to adjust, but O4 is not stated.
|
| S8 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red (op-ed) | conservative | 2026-10-06 | Chris Cargill (Mountain States Policy Center) |
Chris Cargill: Fact Check—Washington's income tax initiative doesn't "cut" government programs
|
seattlered.com | full | opinion | 1 | 1 | 1 | none | none | NA |
"income tax"
|
none
|
— | YNOK12 | N13B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not-classified-opinion | — | 0 |
none ("18 points" matches the DHM margin swing, 22 to 4)
|
critiqued | Y |
"Because there's nothing to cut. Washington doesn't collect a dime of income tax revenue until 2029."
|
yes: 1 (author); no: 1 (Spokesman-Review, quoted); neutral: 1 (WRC)
|
It concedes the WRC forecast reductions ($3.108B 2027-29; $8.324B 2029-31) but not that the outlook balance depends on them (O4=0). Self-labeled "Fact Check" while running as opinion.
|
| S9 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red | conservative | 2026-10-16 | Jason Rantz |
Vote Yes on I-645 to repeal Washington's income tax
|
seattlered.com | full | opinion | 1 | 2 | 1 | none | none | NA |
"income tax"
|
none
|
— | YLEAVE | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
critiqued | N |
"That spending comes as Democrats concede wealthy residents are already heading for the exits."
|
yes: 1 (Ginzburg); no: 2 (Rep. Ryu; Sen. Pedersen, paraphrase); neutral: 1 (WPC as cited)
|
Pedersen's concession was about the 2025 estate tax, and the column extends it to the income tax. The Ryu $250K quote is accurate and relevant.
|
| S10 | Seattle Red/KTTH | Seattle Red | conservative | 2026-10-19 | (page meta: Jason Rantz) |
Ken Jennings hit as 'Tax Man' in new I-645 repeal ad
|
seattlered.com | full | news | 2 | 1 | 2 | yes | yes | N |
other: "I-645 repeal ad"
|
reporter voice: "stripped 79-year-old pension protections" (subhead), not on list
|
— | YPENS;YCOME | N13B;NBREAK | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
It repeats "Even the number is padded" and frames $13B against $11.4B (different windows: FY29-32 vs FY27-31). The $13B is the fiscal note's figure, not a No-campaign padding.
|
none | N |
"The top donor, at $3 million, is the Washington Education Association, whose members' pensions lost their state tax exemption under the law."
|
yes: 2 (Vote Yes campaign; Rantz column); no: 1 (Jennings ad); neutral: 2 (House bill report; EY analysis)
|
**Unchecked YPENS in a news story.** It does not say that a pension is taxed only if household income exceeds $1M (WPC's own Frost says no pension comes close). No No-side response to the pension ad.
|
| C1 | The Center Square | The Center Square | conservative | 2026-07-15 | Carleen Johnson |
Washington income tax repeal initiative officially certified for November ballot
|
thecentersquare.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 1 | yes | yes | N |
"income tax repeal initiative"
|
none
|
— | YCOME | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"protect families and small businesses from Olympia expanding their state income tax on all Washingtonians"
|
yes: 1 (LGW/Heywood); no: 1 (Ferguson); neutral: 1 (SOS, process)
|
O1 appears only as an LGW claim ("will remain uncut"). The release gets the last word, and Heywood's "on all Washingtonians" goes unchallenged.
|
| C2 | The Center Square | The Center Square | conservative | 2026-07-23 | TJ Martinell |
Public unions make up nearly all of contributions against WA income tax repeal
|
thecentersquare.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 1 | no | yes | Y |
"income tax repeal"
|
none from list. Reporter voice asserts unions "will directly benefit".
|
— | YLEAK | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none clear. Says the exemption covers "individuals who make less than $1 million"; it is a $1M deduction per household (imprecise).
|
none | N |
"Public sector unions, which will directly benefit from the millionaire's tax, make up virtually all the contributions to the campaign against the initiative"
|
yes: 1 (Heywood); no: 1 (SEIU 775 Glickman); neutral: 1 (PDC data)
|
**Asymmetry.** The lede states the unions' financial interest as fact in reporter voice, but the story never mentions Heywood's own interest (O8=0). Heywood's "greedy grifters" gets the last word. Glickman's "deep cuts" and "preserving all the accompanying tax cuts" run without the 2029 timing.
|
| C3 | The Center Square | The Center Square | conservative | 2026-07-24 | Carleen Johnson |
WATCH: Critic blasts 'scare tactic' ballot warning on Washington tax repeal
|
thecentersquare.com | full | news | 2 | 2 | 1 | yes | no | Y |
"Washington tax repeal"
|
Q:scare tactic (headline, in quotes)
|
— | YNOK12 | YUNCON | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | advocate | — | 1 |
Reporter voice: "IP26-645 created a 9.9% tax on income above $1 million". Wrong: ESSB 6346 created the tax, and IP26-645 is the repeal initiative. No correction found.
|
critiqued | N |
"I-645 cuts no program, benefit, or existing funding, it repeals an unconstitutional income tax that will not collect a dollar until 2029."
|
yes: 2 (Frost/WPC; Heywood/LGW); no: 2 (Dem chair Conrad; Invest in WA Now, no comment); neutral: 1 (AG office, Faulk)
|
Verifies Heywood's §8 quote. The AG gets a substantive reply. Frost accurately states O2 and O3b (no current appropriation).
|
| C4 | The Center Square | The Center Square | conservative | 2026-08-07 | Andrew Paxton (Carleen Johnson contrib.) |
Judge upholds income tax ballot disclosure, sparks sponsor outrage
|
thecentersquare.com | full | news | 2 | 0 | 3 | neutral | yes | Y |
"income tax ballot disclosure"
|
Q:lies ("their lies and misinformation", Heywood)
|
— | — | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | advocate | — | 0 |
none. Calls it a tax "on those making $1 million or more"; it is on income above $1M (imprecise).
|
quoted | N |
"We will not quietly accept their lies and misinformation when they have made their true intentions with this tax plain"
|
yes: 2 (Heywood; Littell/LGW); no: 0; neutral: 3 (Judge Lanese; AG Faulk; West)
|
O3b appears only as LGW's argument. No No-campaign voice, although opponents had their own appeal on the wording.
|
| C5 | The Center Square | The Center Square | conservative | 2026-09-03 | Carleen Johnson |
Challenge lost; Washington Supreme Court fractured over income tax repeal fight
|
thecentersquare.com | full | news | 0 | 0 | 2 | neutral | neutral | N |
"income tax repeal fight"
|
none
|
— | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | advocate | — | 1 |
**Misquotes the PIID.** It introduces the ballot text as "which states:" and then prints "Opponents contend that this measure would decrease funding for public K-12 education...". The actual PIID reads "This measure would decrease funding...". The added words make the state's statement look like a partisan claim. Still on the page (no correction).
|
quoted | N |
"Challengers argue it is factually inaccurate to say that money is being cut because you can't cut something that doesn't exist as yet"
|
yes: 0; no: 0; neutral: 2 (West; Court via order)
|
The challengers' argument is paraphrased in reporter voice. No AG or No-side response.
|
| C6 | The Center Square | The Center Square | conservative | 2026-09-22 | Carleen Johnson |
Public-sector unions pour millions into campaign to keep Washington income tax
|
thecentersquare.com | full | news | 2 | 2 | 1 | no | yes | Y |
"income tax"
|
Q:hole ("budget hole", in ST and Frost quotes); Q:rig (WEA)
|
— | YUNCON;YLEAK | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | advocate | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"these income tax revenues are not going to new programs…they're going to backfill a budget hole"
|
yes: 2 (LGW statement; Frost/WPC); no: 2 (WEA statement; Seattle Times ed board, quoted); neutral: 1 (PDC)
|
**Notable:** WPC's Frost, a Yes source, concedes O4 (the revenue backfills the deficit) while calling the cuts claims inaccurate. The story does not notice the tension. O7: No about $10M vs Yes about $5M.
|
| C7 | The Center Square | The Center Square (syndicated on Seattle Red) | conservative | 2026-09-30 | The Center Square (no named byline) |
Natural gas ruling could threaten WA income tax, I-645
|
seattlered.com | full | news | 3 | 2 | 1 | yes | yes | N |
"income tax"
|
Q:"public sector unions, who stand to gain the most" (Frost)
|
— | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"handing opponents like the public sector unions, who stand to gain the most from additional government spending, the exact same single-subject argument"
|
yes: 3 (BIAW Lane; Frost/WPC; WSRP Walsh); no: 2 (Sierra Club; Pacifica attorneys, on I-2066 only); neutral: 1 (Court ruling)
|
Legal-risk story aimed at the income tax. Nobody defending ESSB 6346 responds. It does not mention the reverse risk (I-645's "measured by" language, O9).
|
| C8 | The Center Square | The Center Square (op-ed) | conservative | 2026-10-14 | Chris Cargill (Mountain States Policy Center) |
Op-Ed: Hey Ken Jennings, I'll take misinformation for $1,000
|
thecentersquare.com | full | opinion | 1 | 1 | 0 | none | none | NA |
other: "Ken Jennings ... misinformation"
|
none from list ("whopper")
|
— | YNOK12 | N13B;NBREAK | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not-classified-opinion | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"There is no tax break on the ballot. The initiative essentially keeps taxes the same as they are today."
|
yes: 1 (author); no: 1 (Jennings ad); neutral: 0
|
Accurate on current appropriations. Calls the tax "constitutionally suspect" (hedged, so not coded YUNCON).
|
| D1 | The Daily Wire | The Daily Wire | conservative | 2026-10-14 | Jason Rantz |
Jeopardy! Host Doubles Down On Lies Leaving Washington Taxpayers Searching For Answers
|
dailywire.com | full | opinion | 1 | 1 | 1 | none | none | NA |
"income tax"
|
"lies"/"lying" (lies); "rigged"
|
— | YPENS | NBREAK;N13B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | not-classified-opinion | — | 1 |
"Even the number is padded" mislabels the fiscal note's FY29-32 $13B as padding against OFM's FY27-31 $11.4B (window mismatch). It calls $13B "the No campaign's four-year projection", but the figure is from the state fiscal note. No correction.
|
critiqued | N |
"Even the number is padded. The state's fiscal impact statement puts the revenue loss at $11.4 billion across fiscal years 2027 through 2031."
|
yes: 1 (NFIB Milito); no: 1 (Jennings ad); neutral: 1 (fiscal impact statement)
|
Runs in the "news" URL path but is a signed column, so coded opinion. O1: "I-645 doesn't take away any tax relief for anyone." O7: $11.5M, mostly unions.
|
| W1 | Washington Policy Center | Washington Policy Center (blog) | conservative | 2026-08-07 | Ryan Frost |
Judge's own words expose bias in state-mandated ballot language
|
washingtonpolicy.org | full | opinion | 1 | 0 | 2 | none | none | NA |
other: "income-tax repeal"
|
none
|
— | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not-classified-opinion | — | 0 |
none
|
critiqued | N |
"IP26-645 does not cut an appropriation for a single school, college, hospital or health-care provider."
|
yes: 1 (author); no: 0; neutral: 2 (Judge Lanese; the state)
|
Accurate and scoped to current appropriations. It says the state projects 2027 deficits but not that the outlook counts this revenue (O4=0).
|
| W2 | Washington Policy Center | Washington Policy Center (blog) | conservative | 2026-09-17 | Ryan Frost |
Why lawmakers are going after your pension
|
washingtonpolicy.org | full | opinion | 1 | 0 | 1 | none | none | NA |
other: "your pension"
|
none
|
— | YCOME | YPENS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"The only conclusion a rational person can make, then, is that lawmakers built this tax in preparation for the deduction coming down."
|
yes: 1 (author); no: 0; neutral: 1 (DRS report)
|
**Best practice on YPENS facts,** but the headline and closing ("stop lawmakers from ... taxing your pension") frame a hypothesis as certainty. It does not consider other drafting reasons for the pension language, such as the blanket "exempt from any state tax" pension statutes.
|
| W3 | Washington Policy Center | Washington Policy Center (letter) | conservative | 2026-09-23 | Ryan Frost |
The Seattle Times' case against income tax repeal needs correcting
|
washingtonpolicy.org | full | opinion | 1 | 1 | 1 | none | none | NA |
"income tax repeal"
|
none
|
— | — | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"The Legislature therefore may amend, delay, or repeal those separate tax relief and credit expansion provisions by a simple-majority vote in 2027 or 2028"
|
yes: 1 (author); no: 1 (Seattle Times ed board, quoted); neutral: 1 (AGO 1988 No. 25)
|
Courteous, sourced correction request. It confirms O1 and also shows that the relief is not locked in.
|
| W4 | Washington Policy Center | Washington Policy Center (blog) | conservative | 2026-10-16 | David Boze |
This is Jeopardy! The scores really change after the income tax is in place
|
washingtonpolicy.org | full | opinion | 1 | 1 | 0 | none | none | NA |
"income tax"
|
none
|
— | YNOK12;YUNCON;YLEAVE | NBREAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
No hard error. "$7 to $10 billion dollar deficit" is unsourced.
|
critiqued | N |
"The income tax pays $0 dollars for public schools now, so if voters were to eliminate it, it would cut $0 dollars from our K-12 system."
|
yes: 1 (author); no: 1 (Jennings ad); neutral: 0
|
**The plainest YNOK12 in the set,** from a think tank whose own Frost conceded the revenue "backfill[s] a budget hole" (C6). The column cites a looming deficit while claiming a $0 effect.
|
| W5 | Washington Policy Center | Washington Policy Center (blog) | conservative | 2026-10-20 | Ryan Frost |
Four lies being told about the income tax initiative
|
washingtonpolicy.org | full | opinion | 1 | 2 | 1 | none | none | NA |
other: "income tax initiative"
|
"lies" (headline); "scare tactic" ("a deliberate scare tactic")
|
— | YCOME | N13B;NVOTE;N460K | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not-classified-opinion | not-classified-opinion | 0 |
none found
|
critiqued | N |
"Equating a reduction in future projected revenue with actual spending cuts is a deliberate scare tactic."
|
yes: 1 (author); no: 2 (No campaign/pamphlet; April Sims); neutral: 1 (1988 AGO)
|
**Partial best practice:** it concedes that repeal "forces lawmakers to adjust their future spending plans" and that no program gets the money "until the 2027-29 budget is adopted" (O4, weak). It also notes that projections fluctuate (O6).
|
| A1 | Axios Seattle | Axios Seattle | mainstream | 2026-07-14 | Melissa Santos |
Washington millionaires tax faces repeal ballot fight
|
axios.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 0 | no | yes | Y |
millionaires tax
|
— | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"Ferguson said he would veto any legislative effort to lower the $1 million threshold for who pays the tax"
|
yes: 1; no: 1; neutral: 0
|
Short and balanced. Heywood's "coming for all of us" is answered by the veto pledge. Calls Heywood "a hedge fund manager" and LGW "a conservative political committee".
|
| A2 | Axios Seattle | Axios Seattle | mainstream | 2026-10-15 | Melissa Santos |
Washington's new income tax faces a repeal vote under I-645
|
axios.com | full | explainer | 1 | 3 | 1 | yes | yes | Y |
income tax
|
(reporter "tax cuts" is descriptive, about the relief provisions, not loaded)
|
— | — | YUNCON | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"At the same time, it would leave in place several tax cuts that were included in the income tax law."
|
yes: 1; no: 3; neutral: 1
|
The only story in the set that states both O1 (relief stays) and O2 (5% to child care, the rest to state government). Gives no 2029 collection date ("take effect in 2028"). "About 25,000 households" differs from the ~20,000 cited elsewhere; unverified. Opponents' "budget hole" is given without a figure. Fetched with curl after WebFetch returned 403.
|
| PUB-13 | Cascade PBS | Cascade PBS (The Newsfeed) | mainstream | 2026-10-14 | Venice Buhain |
Initiative 645 targets WA Millionaires' Tax
|
cascadepbs.org | full | explainer | 1 | 2 | 0 | yes | no | Y |
millionaires tax
|
none
|
— | — | YCOME | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"The tax is scheduled to take effect in 2028, which means the first collection would be due in April 2029."
|
yes: 1 (supporters/LGW, para); no: 2 (Ferguson, para; opponents, para); neutral: 0
|
Short and neutral. Says I-645 would "explicitly prohibit income taxes" but does not mention the capital-gains risk (O9). The opponents' line that the relief is "unsustainable without the millionaires' tax" implies the relief survives but never says so (O1=0). This is Cascade PBS's only I-645 story in the window. A companion video is at pbs.org/video/initiative-645-targets-wa-millionaires-tax-pyg6tu (not watched).
|
| PUB-18 | Cascadia Daily News | Cascadia Daily News (opinion) | mainstream | 2026-09-23 | Cameron Munro (guest; WEA Fourth Corner council president) |
State's K-12 education funding crisis shows need for 'millionaire's tax'
|
cascadiadaily.com | full | opinion | 0 | 0 | 0 | none | none | NA |
millionaires tax
|
"cuts" (author voice, about district cuts and "cuts to taxes for small businesses")
|
N05 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none checked (author's figures not verified)
|
none | N |
"If your income is under $1 million, you will not pay the tax."
|
yes: 0; no: 0; neutral: 0
|
The author's WEA role is disclosed in the tagline (WEA is a top No on 645 donor). He implies the small-business tax cuts depend on the tax (O1=0). No Yes-side I-645 op-ed was found in CDN's sitemaps, although CDN ran a Yes/No pair on I-638.
|
| PUB-19 | Cascadia Daily News | Cascadia Daily News (WSS reprint) | mainstream | 2026-09-28 | Jerry Cornfield (WSS) |
State's budget hurdles remain but 'millionaire's tax' could improve outlook
|
cascadiadaily.com | full | news | 2 | 1 | 3 | yes | yes | Y |
millionaires tax
|
"gaping hole", "slashing" (attributed paraphrase)
|
— | — | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | fact | 1 |
"wage income" (see PUB-03)
|
none | N |
"It is the source of the revenue bump in the next budget cycle."
|
yes: 2 (Gildon; supporters, para); no: 1 (anti-initiative forces, para); neutral: 3 (OFM; ERFC; Sen. Robinson)
|
Same text as PUB-05. CDN's new headline is more favorable to the tax ("could improve outlook"), and its subhead reads "That's if voters don't repeal it and the state Supreme Court says it's constitutional."
|
| PUB-20 | Cascadia Daily News | Cascadia Daily News | mainstream | 2026-10-14 | Charlotte Alden |
Stakes are high if schools are poorly funded, say Whatcom students
|
cascadiadaily.com | full | news | 2 | 1 | 2 | no | neutral | Y |
other: none (no tax named)
|
"cuts" (reporter voice, about past school funding cuts, not I-645)
|
— | — | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"(The revenues will go into the general fund; about 42% of that goes to K-12 public schools.)"
|
yes: 2 (candidates Misty Flowers [R]; Justin Pike); no: 1 (Sen. candidate Michael Shepard [D]); neutral: 2 (Rep. Alicia Rule, a D who voted no; candidate Erika Creydt)
|
Coded on the I-645 section of a school-funding forum story. Best practice for O2: a parenthetical in reporter voice. Flowers's "potential application to lower income thresholds" goes unanswered, but it is phrased as a possibility, so YCOME is not coded.
|
| PUB-17 | Deseret News | Deseret News | mainstream | 2026-10-15 | Emily Walker |
Washington millionaires debate the state's millionaire tax
|
deseret.com | full | news | 2 | 3 | 1 | yes | no | Y |
millionaires tax
|
Q:hole; Q:cuts; Q:"hedge fund mogul"; "cuts" (paraphrase attributed to opponents)
|
N13B;NBREAK;NHEDGE | Y90;YLEAVE | YPENS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
**"$7.7 million supporting it and $5.4 million opposing it" reverses the sides: No on 645 led about 2:1 (PDC). Still uncorrected:** the live page fetched 2026-10-21 (dateModified 2026-10-16) has the same figures and no correction note. Minor: attributes the $3.5B/yr estimate to "Senate Democrats" (it is the ERFC/state economist estimate).
|
none | N |
"about $13.1 million has been raised for and against the initiative, with $7.7 million supporting it and $5.4 million opposing it."
|
yes: 2 (Heywood; LGW statement); no: 3 (Ken Jennings ad; Ferguson; Erik Houser, No on 645); neutral: 1 (Ballotpedia donor data)
|
Utah outlet. Gives no collection date (only "beginning in January 2028"). Quotes the initiative's broad "income" definition but not the capital-gains risk (O9=0). O5 comes from the LGW quote "nothing stopping it from being expanded to everyone". O8: Heywood "moved his business to Washington... drawn to... lack of capital gains tax and income taxes", and says he spent more "than he would get back in tax cuts".
|
| EH-WSS | Everett Herald | Everett Herald (WA State Standard) | mainstream | 2026-07-28 | Jerry Cornfield |
'Government edit'? Two lawsuits challenge state's description of WA income tax measure
|
heraldnet.com | full | news | 2 | 1 | 3 | yes | yes | Y |
income tax
|
Q:attack
|
— | — | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | advocate | — | 0 |
none (typo "Washngton")
|
critiqued | N |
"passing the initiative would in fact lead to increased funding for the budget"
|
yes: 2; no: 1; neutral: 3
|
Litigation story; quotes the full ballot sentence and both challengers' arguments (LGW; Arthur West, counted on the Yes side as an ally). NPI's Villeneuve rebuts. O3b (q): LGW says repeal only affects future budgets. Notes 2024 statements did not stop LGW measures from losing.
|
| EH-KATZ | Everett Herald | Everett Herald (op-ed) | mainstream | 2026-09-25 | Aaron Katz (UW School of Public Health, emeritus) |
Vote 'No' on I-645 for health, wellbeing of families
|
heraldnet.com | full | opinion | 0 | 1 | 0 | none | none | NA |
none
|
hole ("federal funding hole")
|
NMEALS;N460K | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | not-classified-opinion | 1 |
Author voice: free meals, WFTC and small-business relief "funded by the tax", which implies repeal removes them. They stay (AG). "Only about 1% of taxpayers": closer to 0.5% (minor).
|
none | N |
"And the small business tax relief, which is funded by the tax, means their business taxes are reduced by around $4,000."
|
yes: 0; no: 1; neutral: 0
|
Example family attributes all relief to the tax. Says lawmakers "won't be able to fill" the H.R. 1 Medicaid gap without it (O4).
|
| EH-WELCH | Everett Herald | Everett Herald (staff column) | mainstream | 2026-09-29 | Todd Welch |
Welch: Your pension is in the tax because $1 million will not stay $1 million
|
heraldnet.com | full | opinion | 2 | 3 | 1 | yes | no | NA |
other ("the tax")
|
scapegoat (not listed)
|
— | YCOME | NBREAK;N13B;YPENS | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | not-classified-opinion | 1 |
Unverified author-voice numbers: spending +148% vs collections +112% (2013-25); "$4.8 billion above revenue". Pedersen "pie crust promise" quote attributed to 2025.
|
none | N |
"You cannot give someone a break from a tax they have never paid."
|
yes: 2; no: 3; neutral: 1
|
Herald columnist (Yes-leaning). Says the $1M line is "ordinary law" changeable by majority (O5), that No is "financed overwhelmingly" by WEA/WFSE/SEIU (O7), and acknowledges a "projected shortfall" (O4). Omits relief surviving repeal (O1) and Heywood's stake (O8).
|
| EH-NORM | Everett Herald | Everett Herald (op-ed) | mainstream | 2026-10-10 | Courtney Normand (Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates) |
These 3 ballot initiatives threaten to enact harmful policies
|
heraldnet.com | full | opinion | 1 | 2 | 0 | yes | no | NA |
none
|
slash; gut; extreme; "MAGA millionaire" (author voice)
|
N13B;NMEALS;NHEDGE;NBREAK | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Author voice: I-645 "eliminates free school meals for many K-12 students", but the meals law is not repealed. "$13 billion in funding for education and childcare" stated as a current cut.
|
none | N |
"Initiative 645 takes away $13 billion in funding for education and childcare, eliminates free school meals for many K-12 students"
|
yes: 1; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
Already in §7 of no-side findings. Cites the ST editorial board as "slamming" all three measures.
|
| F1 | Fox 13 Seattle | Fox 13 Seattle | mainstream | 2026-07-02 | Hana Kim |
Opponents file 511K signatures to repeal WA millionaire tax
|
fox13seattle.com | full | news | 2 | 2 | 0 | yes | yes | Y |
millionaire tax
|
— | NMEALS | — | N460K | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | — | 1 |
Minor: "Pacific Law Group" should be Pacifica Law Group.
|
none | N |
"If I-645 passes, the state would still be on the hook to pay for those perks."
|
yes: 2; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
One of the few stories to cover the capital-gains risk (O9) and the fact that relief survives (O1). Yes: Heywood, BIAW's Lane. No: WEA's Delaney ("so greedy") and Invest in WA Now, whose GBAO 57-38 poll is reported.
|
| F2 | Fox 13 Seattle | Fox 13 Seattle | mainstream | 2026-07-14 | Dan Griffin |
Battle brews over Washington 'millionaires tax' repeal initiative
|
fox13seattle.com | full | news | 1 | 2 | 0 | no | yes | Y |
'millionaires tax' repeal
|
— | N13B;NMEALS;N460K | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"Supporters of the tax, including teachers and labor unions, warn that a repeal would wipe out key programs funded by the revenue."
|
yes: 1; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
The summary bullets repeat Ferguson's $13B "for school meals, working family tax credits, and small business tax cuts" with no note that the tax relief survives repeal. The reporter calls LGW "the conservative PAC". Ferguson's veto pledge is the O5 source.
|
| F3 | Fox 13 Seattle | Fox 13 Seattle | mainstream | 2026-08-21 | Hana Kim |
'An economic chill': Seattle architect says 'millionaires tax' fears killed major project
|
fox13seattle.com | full | news | 1 | 0 | 0 | yes | yes | N |
'millionaires tax' (URL/title tag: "Millionaires tax fears trigger client exodus in WA")
|
— | — | YLEAVE | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Calls an enacted law "proposed" ("Washington's proposed 'millionaires tax'", "proposed 9.9% tax") and says lawmakers "push forward with" it. It was signed 3/30/2026. No correction found.
|
none | N |
"He says he can personally vouch and declare that a wealth exodus is happening, but quietly."
|
yes: 1; no: 0; neutral: 0
|
Single source, no No-side response beyond a generic "Supporters say" line. The anecdote isn't checked against data.
|
| F4 | Fox 13 Seattle | Fox 13 Seattle | mainstream | 2026-10-13 | Hana Kim |
How wording on Nov. ballot could help side supporting WA's 'millionaires tax' (earlier: "Wording on Nov. ballot significantly helps side supporting WA's 'millionaires tax'")
|
fox13seattle.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 3 | no | neutral | Y |
'millionaires tax'
|
— | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | critiqued | Y |
"The absence of that single fiscal impact sentence changed a 22 point margin down to just four points."
|
yes: 1; no: 1; neutral: 3
|
The Arthur West story. Quotes the full ballot sentence, the AG's defense, and the 4-4 Supreme Court split. Reports both DHM splits (57-35 / 44-40). Neutral sources: West (a nonpartisan litigant who supports an income tax), the AG office, DHM. Heywood: lawmakers can "lower that threshold easily" (O5). The original headline asserted the effect in outlet voice; it was later softened to "could help".
|
| G02 | KING 5 | KING 5 | mainstream | 2026-07-14 | Dalton Day |
Coalition launches campaign against 'millionaires tax' repeal effort
|
king5.com | full | news | 1 | 2 | 1 | no | yes | Y |
millionaires tax
|
Q:cutting (Kirschner)
|
— | — | YUNCON | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"it will give a handful of mega-millionaires an unneeded tax cut at the expense of 99.5% of Washingtonians"
|
yes: 1 (Heywood; plus a supporters paraphrase); no: 2 (Kirschner; Ferguson); neutral: 1 (SOS)
|
O5 via Ferguson's veto pledge (same convention as the other TV rows). YUNCON contextualized: notes the pending Klickitat lawsuit. Kirschner's "cutting education and healthcare" has no dollar figure, so not N13B. Heywood gets the last word ("greedy efforts of the unions").
|
| G03 | KING 5 | KING 5 | mainstream | 2026-08-04 | KING 5 Staff |
Washington voters have to wait until November to decide on 'millionaires tax' fate
|
king5.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 0 | yes | no | Y |
millionaires tax
|
none
|
— | — | YCOME | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Reporter voice: "The money from the tax on individual and household wage income above $1 million a year is supposed to fund childcare, K-12 education and free school meals." Implies dedication (general fund; only 5% dedicated; free meals are intent only) and says "wage income" (it is AGI-based). Also garbles Gregoire/Locke ("did not endorse the initiative, saying Washington has a 'spending problem'"). No correction found.
|
none | N |
"The money from the tax ... is supposed to fund childcare, K-12 education and free school meals."
|
yes: 1 (Littell, LGW); no: 1 (Watt, EOI); neutral: 0
|
Littell: "They can lower that deductible if they wanted to" (O5=1); Watt rebuts with the veto pledge, so YCOME counted as contextualized.
|
| G04 | KING 5 | KING 5 | mainstream | 2026-09-17 | KING 5 Staff |
KING 5 to air debate on I-645 to repeal millionaires tax
|
king5.com | full | news | 0 | 0 | 0 | none | none | NA |
millionaires tax
|
none
|
— | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
mentioned | N |
"The hourlong debate will focus on the ballot measure, including its potential effects on Washington's budget and residents."
|
yes: 0; no: 0; neutral: 0
|
Debate announcement; no advocates quoted. Headline also says "new income tax on households earning more than $1 million" in body.
|
| G01 | KING 5 | KING 5 | mainstream | 2026-10-09 | Jim Nelson |
Washington millionaires tax: Both sides clash over cuts, future of tax
|
king5.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 0 | no | no | Y |
millionaires tax
|
cuts (headline)
|
— | YNOK12 | N13B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | advocate | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"After the debate, KING 5 pressed Sims on what specific cuts could be made."
|
yes: 1; no: 1; neutral: 0
|
[also/read via: https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/washington-millionaires-tax-both-sides-060902249.html] Best practice: it tested the No side's $13B claim. Herrera Beutler's "not a dime" is not set against the 2027-29 outlook (O4=0). Sims's "working people would have the final say" (NVOTE) is answered only by HB's point that the Legislature passed it without a vote (O5=0). KREM carries the identical story.
|
| R1 | KIRO 7 | KIRO 7 | mainstream | 2026-07-14 | Brandon Thompson |
The fight over the 'Millionaires Tax' is coming to your ballot
|
kiro7.com | full | news | 1 | 2 | 0 | no | no | Y |
'Millionaires Tax'
|
— | — | YUNEMP | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
"The estimated $3 billion in revenue a year from the tax is earmarked in the law for education, childcare and food security programs." Wrong: Sec. 202 deposits it to the general fund, with only 5% to Fair Start from 7/2029. No correction found.
|
none | N |
"The estimated $3 billion in revenue a year from the tax is earmarked in the law for education, childcare and food security programs."
|
yes: 1; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
Reporter voice: "hedge-fund and conservative political activist Brian Heywood takes another swing to rescind progressive policy initiatives." Not a codebook term, but slanted. O1 coded 1: "would only repeal the Millionaires Tax".
|
| R2 | KIRO 7 | KIRO 7 | mainstream | 2026-07-17 | KIRO 7 News Staff |
Initiative to repeal WA 'millionaires tax' qualifies for November ballot
|
kiro7.com | full | news | 1 | 2 | 0 | yes | no | Y |
'millionaires tax'
|
— | — | YCOME | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"This means that the first tax returns and payments for 2028 taxable income will be due in April 2029."
|
yes: 1; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
Rebuttal is weak: No on 645's Houser only calls the repeal "sloppy and irresponsible". Reporter voice: "Some of the funds will go toward K-12 education, free school breakfast and lunch...", which is vague but not strictly wrong. The McKenna suit is framed correctly as pending.
|
| R3 | KIRO 7 | KIRO 7 | mainstream | 2026-10-04 | Linzi Sheldon |
Will Washington's 'millionaire tax' drive people away? Business owners and lawmakers disagree
|
kiro7.com | full | news | 2 | 2 | 0 | yes | no | Y |
'millionaire tax'
|
— | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Likely mischaracterization: "More than half of the revenue, about $2.15 billion, would go to the state's general fund", listing WFTC/B&O "allocations" as separate. Under Sec. 202 about 95% goes to the general fund. The figures come from the pro-tax campaign.
|
none | N |
"KIRO 7 obtained state projections from the campaign in support of the millionaires tax that show Washington expects to collect about $3.57 billion annually"
|
yes: 2; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
Yes sources are a spa owner and a realtor; No sources are Dhingra and the pro-tax campaign's projections. The departure anecdotes are rebutted by Dhingra. The reporter asked Dhingra "Why wasn't this put to voters first?" O2 coded 1 but partial.
|
| R4 | KIRO 7 | KIRO 7 | mainstream | 2026-10-19 | KIRO 7 News Staff |
Washington General Election 2026: Statewide initiatives on the ballot
|
yahoo.com | full | explainer | 0 | 0 | 0 | none | none | Y |
other: "Statewide initiatives"
|
— | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
"The bill will impose a 9.9% tax on those earning one million dollars per year or more." Wrong: the tax applies only to income above $1M, so someone earning exactly $1M owes nothing. No correction found.
|
none | N |
"The bill will impose a 9.9% tax on those earning one million dollars per year or more in Washington."
|
yes: 0; no: 0; neutral: 0
|
Short voter guide with generic supporter and opponent lines only.
|
| K01 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-07-14 | Natalie Fahmy |
Opponents argue millionaires' tax repeal will strip k-12 funding
|
komonews.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 0 | no | yes | Y |
millionaires tax repeal
|
Q:cuts
|
— | YPENS | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | fact | 0 | — | none | N |
"That's because without the millionaires tax revenue, the state will need to figure out a different place to find funding for the sales tax exemptions."
|
yes: 1; no: 1; neutral: 0
|
Fitzgibbon (no) vs Heywood (yes). Heywood: "so they can tax the pensions" gets no pension context. O4 coded 1 for the reporter's own funding-gap line. Headline frames the No claim ("will strip k-12 funding") as the subject.
|
| K02 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-07-14 | Chris Daniels |
Ferguson, organized labor launch No on I-645 campaign
|
komonews.com | full | news | 2 | 2 | 0 | no | no | Y |
other: "No on I-645 campaign"
|
— | N460K | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"argued the initiative would reverse tax breaks and funding commitments passed by lawmakers earlier this year."
|
yes: 2; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
Ferguson's claim that the revenue "must, by law" go to WFTC, diaper relief etc. is unchecked; Sec. 202 sends it to the general fund. Says the relief would be reversed with no AG context (O1=0). SEIU's $1M is mentioned, and Heywood says unions benefit, but there is no union share or Yes total (O7=0). Ferguson's veto pledge rebuts YCOME.
|
| K03 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-07-16 | KOMO News Staff |
Washington millionaires tax repeal, I-645, will appear on November ballot
|
komonews.com | full | news | 2 | 2 | 0 | yes | no | Y |
millionaires tax repeal
|
— | N460K | — | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"The dollars that come in from the millionaires' tax must, by law, go to those things,"
|
yes: 2; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
Largely a rewrite of K02, plus certification and "first actual collection will begin in 2029." Ends on Ferguson's inaccurate earmark claim with no correction.
|
| K04 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-07-21 | KOMO News Staff |
Rick Steves, Ken Jennings back campaign to stop repeal of Washington's 'Millionaires Tax'
|
komonews.com | full | news | 0 | 3 | 0 | no | no | N |
'Millionaires Tax'
|
Q:cuts ("devastating budget cuts"); "cut $13 billion" (attributed paraphrase)
|
N13B;N460K;NMEALS;N05 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"Initiative 645 would repeal the Millionaires Tax and cut $13 billion in funding for services including health care, K-12 education and child care"
|
yes: 0; no: 3; neutral: 0
|
A press-release rewrite with no Yes voice, no 2029 date and no AG relief statement. Prints the No coalition's own poll (57-38) and its "22 points below" benchmark. This is the worst No-side passthrough in the TV set.
|
| K05 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-08-06 | Chris Daniels |
Washington primary offers early clues on millionaires tax repeal fight
|
komonews.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 1 | yes | yes | Y |
millionaires tax repeal
|
— | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"Public disclosure records have shown nearly $2.5 million in contributions from labor organizations backing the campaign to defeat Initiative 645 since July 9th."
|
yes: 1; no: 1; neutral: 1
|
Neutral source: Joe Nguyen (Seattle Chamber). Labor money is named but there is no share or comparison with Yes (O7=0, partial). Reports the No campaign's internal poll (59% no) as "provided by the campaign". Balanced.
|
| K06 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-09-27 | Natalie Fahmy |
Millionaires tax campaigns ramp up, voters to decide on repeal in November
|
komonews.com | full | news | 2 | 2 | 0 | no | no | Y |
millionaires tax repeal
|
Q:tax break; Q:cuts
|
NVOTE | — | N13B;NBREAK;YPENS;YCOME | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | fact | 0 | — | none | N |
"The new law does not specifically allocate the amount of money that would go towards K-12 education or healthcare."
|
yes: 2; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
A best-practice ad check: it notes there is no K-12 allocation, that collection starts in 2029, and pension context. O4: "help keep the state budget well-funded as Washington faces major money shortfalls." Watt's "voters are always going to have the final say" stands. The story says the law has "no protections from expansion" but never says the Legislature can lower the threshold without a vote. The brief listed this as 9/29; metadata says 9/27.
|
| K07 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-09-29 | Joel Moreno |
Survey find(s) ballot language could sway November vote on millionaires tax
|
komonews.com | full | news | 1 | 1 | 1 | yes | yes | Y |
millionaires tax
|
cuts (reporter describing the ballot language: "language about possible cuts")
|
— | YCOME | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | advocate | advocate | 0 | — | critiqued | Y |
"Among respondents shown ballot language without the fiscal statement, opposition fell to 44%, while support for repeal rose to 40%."
|
yes: 1; no: 1; neutral: 1
|
Reports both splits (57-35 with the sentence, 44-40 without), MOE 4.9, and DHM's Krnacik. The Yes statement closes the story unchallenged ("income tax is coming for them"). O3a appears via the Yes group's argument. Villeneuve ("we're expecting to get this money now") hints at O4 but does not state it.
|
| K08 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-10-02 | KOMO News Staff |
How worried are you that the income threshold will be lowered for the millionaires tax?
|
komonews.com | full | news | 3 | 2 | 0 | no | yes | Y |
millionaires tax
|
— | — | YCOME;YLEAVE | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | advocate | — | 0 | — | critiqued | N |
"Democrat Senator Manka Dhingra said there are strong protections against reducing the income tax threshold."
|
yes: 3; no: 2; neutral: 0
|
Rep. Ryu (D) is quoted as open to $250K, a strong O5 illustration. But the reporter's paraphrase of "strong protections" goes unchecked: only an inflator exists, and a simple majority can lower the threshold. Includes a reader poll widget. DHM is named only inside the Yes statement, with no numbers.
|
| K09 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-10-08 | Chris Daniels |
Heywood, Dhingra clash over Washington's millionaire tax at Bellevue forum
|
komonews.com | full | news | 2 | 3 | 1 | yes | yes | Y |
millionaire tax
|
— | — | — | N13B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"Supporters of I-645 dispute the campaign's characterization of immediate cuts, noting the tax is not scheduled to be collected until 2029."
|
yes: 2; no: 3; neutral: 1
|
KOMO's own reporter moderated. Gives the No total ($11.5M) and its union donors (WEA $3M, WFSE $2.5M, NEA $564K) but no Yes total (O7=0, partial). Uses OFM's $11.4B rather than the No side's $13B. Good practice.
|
| K10 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-10-20 | Chris Daniels |
Seattle's Children's CEO: Millionaires Tax will have philanthropic unintended consequences
|
komonews.com | full | news | 0 | 2 | 1 | neutral | neutral | Y |
Millionaires Tax
|
— | N460K | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | none | N |
"He argued that if voters approve Initiative 645, programs for families would be at risk."
|
yes: 0; no: 2; neutral: 1
|
Ferguson says the tax "would eliminate" B&O for more than half of businesses and expand WFTC to 480,000 families, implying repeal loses them. The AG says that relief survives repeal, and the story doesn't say so. Longhurst is a neutral critic of the deduction cap. Possibly the "10/19" item in the brief.
|
| K11 | KOMO | KOMO | mainstream | 2026-10-20 | KOMO News Staff |
Governor urges voters to reject I-645 over impacts on child care
|
komonews.com | full | news | 1 | 3 | 0 | no | yes | N |
other: "I-645 ... child care"
|
hole, cuts (attributed paraphrase of Ferguson, not in quotes)
|
— | YCOME | N13B;YPENS | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Minor: "Ballots ... will be mailed out on Oct. 16" is stale future tense in a 10/20 story.
|
none | N |
"blow a $13 billion hole in the state budget." ... "This tax is not yet collected"
|
yes: 1; no: 3; neutral: 0
|
Herrera Beutler's quotes are recycled from K06 ("argued last month") and answer expansion, not the $13B. Watt's $13B "cuts" quote is also recycled. The child-care subsidy point is legitimate (the 5% Fair Start share), but that isn't explained. The law's purpose clause ("to fund K-12...") is quoted and works against O2.
|
| KREM-M2 | KREM | KREM | mainstream | 2026-07-02 | Drew Mikkelsen |
Income tax opponents hope voters will decide 'millionaires tax' fate
|
krem.com | full | news | 2 | 2 | 1 | yes | no | Y |
millionaires tax
|
Q:holes; Q:greedy
|
N460K;NMEALS | YLEAVE | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Reporter voice: households "earning more than $1 million annually in salary" (AGI, not salary). Minor.
|
none | N |
"throwing out the tax would create a billion-dollar holes in future state budgets, threatening funding for ... universal school lunches while raising taxes on small businesses and working families"
|
yes: 2 (opponents paraphrase; Huibregtse, Tree Fruit Assn.); no: 2 (Delaney, WEA; Ferguson); neutral: 1 (SOS)
|
Delaney's paraphrase includes the tax-increase (N460K) and school-lunch (NMEALS) claims unchecked; "it is driving wealthy residents out of the state" (YLEAVE) unchecked.
|
| KREM-M1 | KREM | KREM | mainstream | 2026-09-29 | Jordan Pagkalinawan |
What to know about I-645, the 'Millionaires Tax'
|
krem.com | full | explainer | 1 | 2 | 1 | yes | no | Y |
millionaires tax
|
cut (reporter paraphrase: groups "noting it would cut $13 billion")
|
N13B;N460K | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
Reporter voice "noting it would cut $13 billion for K-12 schools, healthcare and child care, as well as increase taxes on families and small businesses": "noting" presents the No claims as fact; relief survives (AG). Lede calls I-645 itself the "Millionaires Tax" that "would take effect in 2028". No correction found.
|
mentioned | Y |
"Numerous local groups have staunchly opposed the initiative, noting it would cut $13 billion for K-12 schools, healthcare and child care"
|
yes: 1 (Herrera Beutler); no: 2 (local groups paraphrase; League of Women Voters); neutral: 1 (poll)
|
Reports the DHM split in full (57-35-8 / 44-40-16). Herrera Beutler's "16% more every budget year" also unchecked (not a checklist code).
|
| PUB-08 | KUOW | KUOW | mainstream | 2026-07-14 | Scott Greenstone |
Democrats, allies gear up to fight for 'millionaires tax'
|
kuow.org | full | news | 1 | 1 | 0 | no | yes | Y |
millionaires tax
|
Q:cuts; reporter voice "Unions are dumping cash" (not on the list)
|
— | YUNCON | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"It's a choice between investing in our kids' education and child care access and affordability, or going backwards with cuts to education"
|
yes: 1 (Heywood); no: 1 (Ferguson); neutral: 0
|
Gives no start date for collections (O3a=0). Union donors named as the No side's funding. Heywood's YCOME is answered by Ferguson's veto pledge. YLEAVE is framed as "Critics like Heywood have argued" and linked to KUOW's "millionaire migration" explainer.
|
| PUB-09 | KUOW | KUOW | mainstream | 2026-09-14 | Deborah Wang |
Fairer taxes or 'slippery slope'? 7 Washingtonians weigh in on the 'millionaires tax'
|
kuow.org | full | news | 4 | 5 | 0 | no | yes | Y |
millionaires tax
|
Q:unconstitutional
|
— | YLEAVE | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
"The passage of the so-called 'millionaires tax' in 2025": wrong, it passed in March 2026. No correction found.
|
none | N |
"They argue the tax is unconstitutional, could eventually apply more broadly, and has already resulted in wealthy people leaving the state."
|
yes: 4 (LGW/Heywood, para; residents Larson, Beck, Albrecht); no: 5 (supporters, para; residents Simmons, Oliveros, Porter, Grant [leaning no]); neutral: 0
|
Community Voices vox-pop feature, roughly balanced (3 yes, 3 no, 1 conflicted). Every omission column is 0, including the 2029 start date.
|
| PUB-10 | KUOW | KUOW (Soundside) | mainstream | 2026-10-08 | Libby Denkmann |
The millionaires tax is on the WA ballot this fall. Both sides make their case
|
kuow.org | full | broadcast | 1 | 1 | 0 | no | yes | Y |
millionaires tax
|
Q:cut; Q:tax break
|
NVOTE | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | advocate | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"voters should understand that they are always going to have the final say on any attempt to lower the threshold."
|
yes: 1 (Herrera Beutler); no: 1 (Rian Watt, EOI); neutral: 0
|
The 2029 date and the lack of an earmark come only from guest Herrera Beutler ("lawmakers... said no" to earmarking). Watt's "$13 billion" cuts claim is rebutted by the guest, not the host, so N13B is not coded. The host narration adds no context.
|
| PUB-11 | KUOW | KUOW | mainstream | 2026-10-09 | Sarah Mizes-Tan |
Should millionaires pay the income tax? Or should everyone?
|
kuow.org | full | news | 2 | 2 | 4 | yes | neutral | Y |
income tax
|
none ("so-called")
|
— | — | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
none
|
none | N |
"I would personally like to see a broader-based income tax, as I have been very clear about for many years"
|
yes: 2 (Heywood; GOP chair Rep. Jim Walsh; plus "Republicans", para); no: 2 (Sen. Majority Leader Pedersen; Ferguson); neutral: 4 (candidates Rep. Ryu and Sen. Salomon; Jared Walczak, Tax Foundation; Wesley Tharpe, CBPP)
|
The closest any outlet comes to O5. Walsh is paraphrased as saying the law "makes it easy for the Legislature to amend it and include non-millionaires", and Pedersen says the barrier is "not [enough] votes in the Legislature" plus a veto. Neither says outright that a simple majority suffices with no public vote. O6 comes from Walczak (a broader tax is "less volatile"). O7: "a campaign by Democrats and labor unions".
|
| PUB-12 | KUOW | KUOW | mainstream | 2026-10-20 | Sarah Mizes-Tan |
WA daycare costs would rise if millionaires tax repealed, Gov. Ferguson says
|
kuow.org | full | news | 1 | 2 | 0 | no | yes | N |
millionaires tax
|
Q:cuts; "cuts" (paraphrase of the center director)
|
— | YCOME | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | fact | 1 |
Reporter voice: "Without the tax, the program would lose funding due to the state's ongoing budget crisis." Stated as fact, but no current appropriation relies on the tax and the 5% Fair Start deposit only starts in 7/2029. No correction.
|
none | N |
"Without the tax, the program would lose funding due to the state's ongoing budget crisis."
|
yes: 1 (Heywood); no: 2 (Ferguson; center director Calderon Shadlow); neutral: 0
|
Ferguson's 5% earmark is reported, but the story never says the other 95% goes to the general fund (O2=0). No rebuttal to the daycare claim: Heywood responds only on the threshold. Has no $13B figure (consistent with no-side-13b notes).
|
40 field definitions
| Field | Type | Meaning | Units | Value type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
story_id |
string | Row identifier assigned by the coder (stable within this release). | — | observed |
outlet |
string | Publishing outlet (masthead), one of 26. | — | observed |
outlet_detail |
string | Outlet as recorded by the coder, e.g. "Seattle Times via Spokesman-Review" for a syndicated copy. | — | observed |
outlet_group |
string | mainstream, conservative or progressive, assigned by the audit design before coding (not by our judgment of each outlet). | — | observed |
date |
date | Publication date (YYYY-MM-DD). | — | observed |
author |
string | Byline as published. | — | observed |
headline |
string | Headline as published. | — | observed |
url |
string | Story URL. Copies used to read blocked pages are listed in notes. | — | observed |
read_status |
string | full or partial (paywall). No row is unread in this release. | — | observed |
type |
string | news, explainer, fact_check, broadcast (counted as news), opinion or editorial. | — | observed |
yes_sources |
integer | Distinct Yes-side (repeal) advocates quoted or paraphrased. | count | observed |
no_sources |
integer | Distinct No-side advocates quoted or paraphrased. | count | observed |
neutral_sources |
integer | Neutral sources (agencies, courts, pollsters, nonpartisan analysts). | count | observed |
first_word |
string | Side of the first advocate quoted: yes, no, neutral or none. | — | observed |
last_word |
string | Side of the last advocate quoted. | — | observed |
rebuttal |
string | Y if the other side responds to the story's lead claim; N if not; NA for opinion. | — | observed |
headline_term |
string | How the headline names the tax. | — | observed |
loaded_terms |
string | Loaded words; Q: prefix = only inside a quotation. | — | observed |
no_claims_unchecked |
string | Semicolon list of No-campaign claim codes repeated with no context on that claim (codebook). | — | observed |
yes_claims_unchecked |
string | Semicolon list of Yes-campaign claim codes repeated with no context. | — | observed |
claims_checked |
string | Claim codes the story itself contextualized or checked. | — | observed |
O1 |
integer | 1 if the story says the tax relief survives repeal (AG statement); 0 if not. | 0/1 | observed |
O2 |
integer | 1 if it says the revenue goes to the general fund / is not dedicated to K-12. | 0/1 | observed |
O3a |
integer | 1 if it says collections start in 2029. | 0/1 | observed |
O3b |
integer | 1 if it says no current appropriation relies on the tax (in any voice; see O3b_voice). | 0/1 | observed |
O4 |
integer | 1 if it says the 2027-29 budget outlook counts on the revenue (in any voice; see O4_voice). | 0/1 | observed |
O5 |
integer | 1 if it says lawmakers, not voters, could lower the $1 million threshold. | 0/1 | observed |
O6 |
integer | 1 if it says the revenue estimate is static or the revenue volatile. | 0/1 | observed |
O7 |
integer | 1 if it reports the No side's union funding or that No outraised Yes. | 0/1 | observed |
O8 |
integer | 1 if it mentions Heywood's (or Yes donors') personal financial interest. | 0/1 | observed |
O9 |
integer | 1 if it mentions the legal risk I-645's text poses to the capital gains tax. | 0/1 | observed |
O3b_voice |
string | fact (reporter or neutral source) or advocate (only in a campaign side's quote) when O3b = 1. | — | derived |
O4_voice |
string | fact or advocate when O4 = 1. | — | derived |
has_error |
integer | 1 if the coder recorded a factual error in reporter or outlet voice, minor ones included. | 0/1 | observed |
errors |
string | The error, the correct fact, and whether a correction was found. | — | observed |
ballot_sentence |
string | none, mentioned, quoted or critiqued. | — | observed |
dhm_poll |
string | Y if the story reports the DHM poll's with/without-sentence result; partial; N. | — | observed |
key_quote |
string | Verbatim passage of 25 words or fewer illustrating the coding. | — | observed |
sources_detail |
string | Who was counted on each side. | — | observed |
notes |
string | Coder notes. | — | observed |
