Saved analyses
King County total homelessness rate vs. rent-predicted rate, all large CoCs
Question: How far is King County's total homelessness rate per 10,000 above or below the rate predicted from its median rent, across 59-66 large CoCs?
Result: 2015: +18.2 (95% PI -26.33 to 62.73); 2016: +20.41 (95% PI -26.65 to 67.48); 2017: +23.35 (95% PI -19.64 to 66.35); 2018: +23.06 (95% PI -18.35 to 64.47); 2019: +16.2 (95% PI -25.07 to 57.47); 2022: +25.87 (95% PI -13.35 to 65.09); 2024: +34.03 (95% PI -22.33 to 90.39)
Operation: Leave-one-out OLS of homelessness rate on median gross rent; King County residual with 95% prediction interval
Scope: All full-count CoCs in the 67-CoC sample, 2015-2024, King excluded from each fit
Estimates with uncertainty
| Estimate | Value | Uncertainty | Method | n |
| 2015 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
18.2 ± 22.29 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -26.33 to 62.73) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
66 |
| 2016 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
20.41 ± 23.45 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -26.65 to 67.48) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
54 |
| 2017 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
23.35 ± 21.52 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -19.64 to 66.35) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
66 |
| 2018 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
23.06 ± 20.65 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -18.35 to 64.47) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
55 |
| 2019 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
16.2 ± 20.66 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -25.07 to 57.47) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
66 |
| 2022 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
25.87 ± 19.61 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -13.35 to 65.09) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
63 |
| 2024 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
34.03 ± 28.14 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -22.33 to 90.39) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
59 |
View this analysis
- Rent alone explains little of the variation across large CoCs, so the prediction intervals are wide.
- King County switched to respondent-driven sampling in 2022; its 2022 and 2024 rates are not directly comparable with visual counts.
- Cross-sectional association within one year; not a causal estimate.
Robustness checks
King County total rate vs. rent-predicted rate, HUD Major City CoCs only
Question: Same as king-total-vs-rent, comparing only with HUD Major City CoCs.
Result: 2015: +1.93 (95% PI -45.25 to 49.1); 2016: -8.11 (95% PI -57.39 to 41.17); 2017: +6.23 (95% PI -38.39 to 50.86); 2018: -7.5 (95% PI -50.63 to 35.62); 2019: -2.63 (95% PI -43.38 to 38.12); 2022: +9.38 (95% PI -27.93 to 46.68); 2024: +14.24 (95% PI -47.74 to 76.21)
Operation: Leave-one-out OLS of homelessness rate on median gross rent; King County residual with 95% prediction interval
Scope: HUD 2025 Major City CoCs with full counts, King excluded
Estimates with uncertainty
| Estimate | Value | Uncertainty | Method | n |
| 2015 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
1.93 ± 23.34 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -45.25 to 49.1) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
42 |
| 2016 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
-8.11 ± 24.19 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -57.39 to 41.17) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
34 |
| 2017 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
6.23 ± 22.08 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -38.39 to 50.86) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
42 |
| 2018 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
-7.5 ± 21.17 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -50.63 to 35.62) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
34 |
| 2019 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
-2.63 ± 20.16 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -43.38 to 38.12) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
42 |
| 2022 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
9.38 ± 18.41 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -27.93 to 46.68) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
39 |
| 2024 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
14.24 ± 30.53 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -47.74 to 76.21) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
37 |
View this analysis
- Rent alone explains little of the variation across large CoCs, so the prediction intervals are wide.
- King County switched to respondent-driven sampling in 2022; its 2022 and 2024 rates are not directly comparable with visual counts.
- Cross-sectional association within one year; not a causal estimate.
Robustness check for:
King County total homelessness rate vs. rent-predicted rate, all large CoCs
King County total rate vs. rent-predicted rate, excluding New York City
Question: Same as king-total-vs-rent, without New York City (right-to-shelter and migrant sheltering).
Result: 2015: +19.67 (95% PI -22.64 to 61.98); 2016: +22.84 (95% PI -21.75 to 67.42); 2017: +24.82 (95% PI -15.6 to 65.24); 2018: +26.27 (95% PI -10.89 to 63.44); 2019: +17.8 (95% PI -20.33 to 55.94); 2022: +26.85 (95% PI -10.93 to 64.64); 2024: +37.02 (95% PI -7.03 to 81.07)
Operation: Leave-one-out OLS of homelessness rate on median gross rent; King County residual with 95% prediction interval
Scope: All full-count CoCs except NYC, King excluded
Estimates with uncertainty
| Estimate | Value | Uncertainty | Method | n |
| 2015 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
19.67 ± 21.17 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -22.64 to 61.98) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
65 |
| 2016 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
22.84 ± 22.21 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -21.75 to 67.42) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
53 |
| 2017 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
24.82 ± 20.23 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -15.6 to 65.24) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
65 |
| 2018 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
26.27 ± 18.52 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -10.89 to 63.44) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
54 |
| 2019 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
17.8 ± 19.08 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -20.33 to 55.94) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
65 |
| 2022 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
26.85 ± 18.89 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -10.93 to 64.64) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
62 |
| 2024 King County total rate minus rent-predicted rate |
37.02 ± 21.99 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -7.03 to 81.07) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
58 |
View this analysis
- Rent alone explains little of the variation across large CoCs, so the prediction intervals are wide.
- King County switched to respondent-driven sampling in 2022; its 2022 and 2024 rates are not directly comparable with visual counts.
- Cross-sectional association within one year; not a causal estimate.
Robustness check for:
King County total homelessness rate vs. rent-predicted rate, all large CoCs
King County unsheltered rate vs. rent-predicted rate, all large CoCs
Question: How far is King County's unsheltered rate per 10,000 above or below the rate predicted from its median rent?
Result: 2015: +8.08 (95% PI -8.94 to 25.09); 2016: +13.85 (95% PI 1.18 to 26.51); 2017: +13.25 (95% PI -3.93 to 30.43); 2018: +19.18 (95% PI 5.91 to 32.44); 2019: +7.52 (95% PI -13.01 to 28.04); 2022: +17.48 (95% PI -7.38 to 42.33); 2024: +25.96 (95% PI 0.7 to 51.22)
Operation: Leave-one-out OLS of homelessness rate on median gross rent; King County residual with 95% prediction interval
Scope: All full-count CoCs, King excluded
Estimates with uncertainty
| Estimate | Value | Uncertainty | Method | n |
| 2015 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
8.08 ± 8.52 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -8.94 to 25.09) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
66 |
| 2016 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
13.85 ± 6.31 per 10,000 residents (95% CI 1.18 to 26.51) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
54 |
| 2017 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
13.25 ± 8.6 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -3.93 to 30.43) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
66 |
| 2018 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
19.18 ± 6.61 per 10,000 residents (95% CI 5.91 to 32.44) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
55 |
| 2019 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
7.52 ± 10.27 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -13.01 to 28.04) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
66 |
| 2022 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
17.48 ± 12.43 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -7.38 to 42.33) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
63 |
| 2024 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
25.96 ± 12.62 per 10,000 residents (95% CI 0.7 to 51.22) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
59 |
View this analysis
- Rent alone explains little of the variation across large CoCs, so the prediction intervals are wide.
- King County switched to respondent-driven sampling in 2022; its 2022 and 2024 rates are not directly comparable with visual counts.
- Cross-sectional association within one year; not a causal estimate.
Robustness check for:
King County total homelessness rate vs. rent-predicted rate, all large CoCs
King County unsheltered rate vs. rent-predicted rate, Major City CoCs
Question: Same as king-unsheltered-vs-rent, Major City CoCs only.
Result: 2015: +2.51 (95% PI -15.76 to 20.79); 2016: +10.9 (95% PI -3.28 to 25.08); 2017: +6.26 (95% PI -11.04 to 23.55); 2018: +15.3 (95% PI -0.08 to 30.67); 2019: -0.83 (95% PI -21.56 to 19.9); 2022: +9.24 (95% PI -17.59 to 36.08); 2024: +19.65 (95% PI -7.35 to 46.66)
Operation: Leave-one-out OLS of homelessness rate on median gross rent; King County residual with 95% prediction interval
Scope: HUD 2025 Major City CoCs with full counts, King excluded
Estimates with uncertainty
| Estimate | Value | Uncertainty | Method | n |
| 2015 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
2.51 ± 9.04 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -15.76 to 20.79) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
42 |
| 2016 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
10.9 ± 6.96 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -3.28 to 25.08) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
34 |
| 2017 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
6.26 ± 8.56 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -11.04 to 23.55) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
42 |
| 2018 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
15.3 ± 7.55 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -0.08 to 30.67) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
34 |
| 2019 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
-0.83 ± 10.26 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -21.56 to 19.9) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
42 |
| 2022 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
9.24 ± 13.24 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -17.59 to 36.08) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
39 |
| 2024 King County unsheltered rate minus rent-predicted rate |
19.65 ± 13.3 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -7.35 to 46.66) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
37 |
View this analysis
- Rent alone explains little of the variation across large CoCs, so the prediction intervals are wide.
- King County switched to respondent-driven sampling in 2022; its 2022 and 2024 rates are not directly comparable with visual counts.
- Cross-sectional association within one year; not a causal estimate.
King County 2024 total rate vs. rent, with count-method adjustment
Question: How does King County's 2024 residual change if the estimated effect of its 2022 switch to respondent-driven sampling is removed?
Result: 2024 total, central method adjustment (1,100 people removed): 29.33 (95% PI -27.03 to 85.69); 2024 total, high method adjustment (3,600 people removed): 18.65 (95% PI -37.71 to 75); 2024 total, Major City sample, central adjustment: 9.54 (95% PI -52.44 to 71.51); 2024 total, Major City sample, high adjustment: -1.15 (95% PI -63.12 to 60.83)
Operation: Leave-one-out OLS of homelessness rate on median gross rent; King County residual with 95% prediction interval
Scope: 2024 fits, full sample and Major City sample
Estimates with uncertainty
| Estimate | Value | Uncertainty | Method | n |
| 2024 total, central method adjustment (1,100 people removed) |
29.33 ± 28.14 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -27.03 to 85.69) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
59 |
| 2024 total, high method adjustment (3,600 people removed) |
18.65 ± 28.14 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -37.71 to 75) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
59 |
| 2024 total, Major City sample, central adjustment |
9.54 ± 30.53 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -52.44 to 71.51) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
37 |
| 2024 total, Major City sample, high adjustment |
-1.15 ± 30.53 per 10,000 residents (95% CI -63.12 to 60.83) |
± one standard error; 95% confidence interval |
Leave-one-out OLS on median rent; 95% prediction interval |
37 |
View this analysis
- Rent alone explains little of the variation across large CoCs, so the prediction intervals are wide.
- King County switched to respondent-driven sampling in 2022; its 2022 and 2024 rates are not directly comparable with visual counts.
- Cross-sectional association within one year; not a causal estimate.
Robustness check for:
King County total homelessness rate vs. rent-predicted rate, all large CoCs
Rent growth 2019-2024 vs. change in homelessness, large CoCs
Question: Did CoCs whose rents rose faster from 2019 to 2024 see larger increases in homelessness?
Result: Rent growth 2019-24 vs % change in total homelessness rate: r = -0.043 (95% CI -0.282 to 0.201); Rent growth 2019-24 vs % change in unsheltered rate: r = -0.007 (95% CI -0.249 to 0.235); Rent growth 2019-24 vs change in total rate per 10,000: r = -0.135 (95% CI -0.366 to 0.11)
Operation: Pearson correlation across CoCs, King County excluded
Scope: 66 large CoCs other than King County
Estimates with uncertainty
| Estimate | Value | Uncertainty | Method | n |
| Rent growth 2019-24 vs % change in total homelessness rate |
-0.043 Pearson correlation coefficient (95% CI -0.282 to 0.201) |
95% confidence interval |
Pearson r across large CoCs excluding King County; 95% CI by Fisher z-transform |
66 |
| Rent growth 2019-24 vs % change in unsheltered rate |
-0.007 Pearson correlation coefficient (95% CI -0.249 to 0.235) |
95% confidence interval |
Pearson r across large CoCs excluding King County; 95% CI by Fisher z-transform |
66 |
| Rent growth 2019-24 vs change in total rate per 10,000 |
-0.135 Pearson correlation coefficient (95% CI -0.366 to 0.11) |
95% confidence interval |
Pearson r across large CoCs excluding King County; 95% CI by Fisher z-transform |
66 |
View this analysis
- ACS median gross rent includes long-tenure leases and lags asking rents.
- Tests only whether changes in rent explain changes in homelessness; rent level remains the strongest cross-sectional correlate.
- Several CoCs changed count methods between 2019 and their end year.
King County rank on rent growth and on change in homelessness, 2019 to latest full count
Question: Where does King County rank among 67 large CoCs on rent growth and on the increase in homelessness since 2019?
Result: Rent growth 2019-24: +21.5%, 60th of 67. Increase in unsheltered rate: +18.7 per 10,000, 4th of 67. Increase in total rate: +22.4 per 10,000, 7th of 67.
Operation: Rank of King County within the 67 CoCs
Scope: 67 large CoCs
View this analysis
- As counted; the 2022 count-method change may account for 0 to about 3,600 of King County's 2024 count (central estimate about 1,100).
- Descriptive ranks, not a causal estimate.